๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$CUM

Fading Quickly

Snapshot Window: 2026-09-22 22:30 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
98
Total Likes
2
Retweets & Quotes
1
Comments
1

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 1, Likes: 2, Impressions: 98

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@0xbrunoamuniz

Elysium testnet is live ( @Kinetiq_xyz @Enter_Elysium ), so I took the liberty of building a personal benchmark: same contract, same load, Elysium (L2) vs HyperEVM (L1), side by side. Early numbers: ~0.27s vs ~1.7s to inclusion ~5.8x cheaper per tx

The image displays a side-by-side benchmark dashboard comparing the Elysium Testnet (L2) and HyperEVM Testnet (L1), both marked as running. The Elysium side shows a p50 chain-side inclusion time of 289 ms with a fee per tx of 0.00000498 HYPE, while the HyperEVM side shows 1,752 ms inclusion with a fee of 0.000285 HYPE, visually confirming the post's claim of ~0.27s vs ~1.7s inclusion times and roughly 5.8x cheaper transactions.

AI visual note: The image displays a side-by-side benchmark dashboard comparing the Elysium Testnet (L2) and HyperEVM Testnet (L1), both marked as running. The Elysium side shows a p50 chain-side inclusion time of 289 ms with a fee per tx of 0.00000498 HYPE, while the HyperEVM side shows 1,752 ms inclusion with a fee of 0.000285 HYPE, visually confirming the post's claim of ~0.27s vs ~1.7s inclusion times and roughly 5.8x cheaper transactions.

Contributing Voices for $CUM

@0xzer0ai