# $CUM Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-22 22:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $CUM  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-22 22:30 UTC (2026-09-22T22:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-22-22-30/crypto/CUM  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-22-22-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 98
- **Likes:** 2
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 1, Likes: 2, Impressions: 98


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @0xbrunoamuniz
> **Author:** [@0xbrunoamuniz](https://x.com/0xbrunoamuniz)  
> **Metrics:** 67 likes · 10 retweets · 18 comments · 3.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/0xbrunoamuniz/status/2102501616783946095](https://x.com/0xbrunoamuniz/status/2102501616783946095)  


> **Visual Context:** The image displays a side-by-side benchmark dashboard comparing the Elysium Testnet (L2) and HyperEVM Testnet (L1), both marked as running. The Elysium side shows a p50 chain-side inclusion time of 289 ms with a fee per tx of 0.00000498 HYPE, while the HyperEVM side shows 1,752 ms inclusion with a fee of 0.000285 HYPE, visually confirming the post's claim of ~0.27s vs ~1.7s inclusion times and roughly 5.8x cheaper transactions.  

> 
> "Elysium testnet is live (
@Kinetiq_xyz
 @Enter_Elysium
), so I took the liberty of building a personal benchmark: same contract, same load, Elysium (L2) vs HyperEVM (L1), side by side.

 Early numbers:
  ~0.27s vs ~1.7s to inclusion
  ~5.8x cheaper per tx"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@0xzer0ai` (https://x.com/0xzer0ai)