๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$PLAY

Heating Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-09-22 16:40 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
1.1K
Total Likes
20
Retweets & Quotes
9
Comments
22

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 22, Retweets: 9, Likes: 20, Impressions: 1102

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@andrewmoh

under-$1b-TVL names ranked by 30d chain fees: + @RobinhoodApp | $992m TVL | $38.86m fees undisputed #1. RWA + lending TVL, fees pushed by on-chain trading + @0xPolygon | $787.66m TVL | $2.3m fees going after payments with Open Money Stack (OMS) + @Starknet | $159.93m TVL |

The chart displays "UNDER $1B TVL NETWORKS" with a logarithmic scale from $10K to $100K+, ranking networks including Robinhood, Polygon, Starknet, Avalanche, Sui Network, NEAR, and XLayer. It complements the post by visually illustrating the dominance of Robinhood's $38.86m in fees among sub-$1B TVL networks, followed distantly by Polygon ($2.3m fees) and Starknet ($159.93m TVL).

AI visual note: The chart displays "UNDER $1B TVL NETWORKS" with a logarithmic scale from $10K to $100K+, ranking networks including Robinhood, Polygon, Starknet, Avalanche, Sui Network, NEAR, and XLayer. It complements the post by visually illustrating the dominance of Robinhood's $38.86m in fees among sub-$1B TVL networks, followed distantly by Polygon ($2.3m fees) and Starknet ($159.93m TVL).

Contributing Voices for $PLAY

@Snowizzie