# $PLAY Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-22 16:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $PLAY  
> **Momentum Status:** Heating Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-22 16:40 UTC (2026-09-22T16:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-22-16-40/crypto/PLAY  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-22-16-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 1.1K
- **Likes:** 20
- **Retweets:** 9
- **Comments:** 22

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 22, Retweets: 9, Likes: 20, Impressions: 1102


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @andrewmoh
> **Author:** [@andrewmoh](https://x.com/andrewmoh)  
> **Metrics:** 11 likes · 0 retweets · 5 comments · 2.0K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/andrewmoh/status/2102427047159374117](https://x.com/andrewmoh/status/2102427047159374117)  


> **Visual Context:** The chart displays "UNDER $1B TVL NETWORKS" with a logarithmic scale from $10K to $100K+, ranking networks including Robinhood, Polygon, Starknet, Avalanche, Sui Network, NEAR, and XLayer. It complements the post by visually illustrating the dominance of Robinhood's $38.86m in fees among sub-$1B TVL networks, followed distantly by Polygon ($2.3m fees) and Starknet ($159.93m TVL).  

> 
> "under-$1b-TVL names ranked by 30d chain fees:

+ 
@RobinhoodApp
 | $992m TVL | $38.86m fees
undisputed #1. RWA + lending TVL, fees pushed by on-chain trading

+ 
@0xPolygon
 | $787.66m TVL | $2.3m fees
going after payments with Open Money Stack (OMS)

+ 
@Starknet
 | $159.93m TVL |"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Snowizzie` (https://x.com/Snowizzie)