🤖 AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$XEC

Trending Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-09-14 15:40 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
81
Total Likes
1
Retweets & Quotes
0
Comments
0

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 81

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@Reboottttttt

Pretty much got it This project is really quite interesting Four kinds of Mint results, four levels Auris: PGP Accepted (using the ninth line from the contract website and generating a brand new set of PGP key pair locally) Submitted Sera: PGP Late Submission (using the tenth

The image displays a table comparing four PGP-related statuses—Auris, Sera, Fur, and Damnatus—for two wallets (BAF2 and 895) holding NFTs #6167 and #14773, showing that both wallets achieved Auris (✓) but failed Fur and Damnatus (✗). It appears to summarize the post's findings about different PGP submission outcomes during a mint process, highlighting that proper PGP usage (Auris) is more complete than wallets lacking PGP or those flagged (Damnatus).

AI visual note: The image displays a table comparing four PGP-related statuses—Auris, Sera, Fur, and Damnatus—for two wallets (BAF2 and 895) holding NFTs #6167 and #14773, showing that both wallets achieved Auris (✓) but failed Fur and Damnatus (✗). It appears to summarize the post's findings about different PGP submission outcomes during a mint process, highlighting that proper PGP usage (Auris) is more complete than wallets lacking PGP or those flagged (Damnatus).

Contributing Voices for $XEC

@TheBCHPodcast