# $XEC Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-14 15:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $XEC  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-14 15:40 UTC (2026-09-14T15:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-14-15-40/crypto/XEC  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-14-15-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 81
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 81


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Reboottttttt
> **Author:** [@Reboottttttt](https://x.com/Reboottttttt)  
> **Metrics:** 14 likes · 0 retweets · 5 comments · 2.9K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Reboottttttt/status/2099513247221317914](https://x.com/Reboottttttt/status/2099513247221317914)  


> **Visual Context:** The image displays a table comparing four PGP-related statuses—Auris, Sera, Fur, and Damnatus—for two wallets (BAF2 and 895) holding NFTs #6167 and #14773, showing that both wallets achieved Auris (✓) but failed Fur and Damnatus (✗). It appears to summarize the post's findings about different PGP submission outcomes during a mint process, highlighting that proper PGP usage (Auris) is more complete than wallets lacking PGP or those flagged (Damnatus).  

> 
> "Pretty much got it

This project is really quite interesting

Four kinds of Mint results, four levels

Auris: PGP Accepted (using the ninth line from the contract website and generating a brand new set of PGP key pair locally) Submitted

Sera: PGP Late Submission (using the tenth"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@TheBCHPodcast` (https://x.com/TheBCHPodcast)