$CAKE
Fading QuicklySnapshot Window: 2026-09-09 08:40 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 1, Likes: 30, Impressions: 1065
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed
Found something interesting around @inkonchain that I want to put on your radar early @CharterFnd Charter Foundation. The account is still basically in stealth, but it already carries the Ink affiliation badge and is followed by INK and several people around the ecosystem What
![]()
AI visual note: A Twitter/X profile page for 'Charter Foundation' (@CharterFnd), joined June 2026, following 7 accounts with 81 followers, followed by regan, Kurt, ink, and 7 others, displayed over a dark mountain landscape header.
Pons doesn’t allow taxes to be changed post-launch. There is a big group of people claiming that this is the case, but it’s simply wrong. What I noticed is that some terminals (for whatever reason) route buys and sells through high-tax pools, even though the Pons-initialized
![]()
AI visual note: The image shows a Uniswap-style trading interface displaying the ZZZ token (contract 0x7dbf...eE6a) with two liquidity pools visible: ZZZ/USDG showing $556.1K liquidity, $2.3M volume, $7.6M FDV, and a 5,671% return, alongside ZZZ/ETH with $373.0K liquidity, $2.7M volume, $7.5M FDV, and a 5,313.40% return. The image relates to the post by illustrating how different trading pools for the same token can route through varying fee/tax structures—relevant to the claim that while Pons allows tax parameters to be adjusted post-launch, certain platforms may inadvertently route trades through higher-tax pools rather than the original Pons-initialized configuration.