# $CAKE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-09-09 08:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $CAKE  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-09-09 08:40 UTC (2026-09-09T08:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-09-08-40/crypto/CAKE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-09-09-08-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 2
- **Total Impressions:** 1.1K
- **Likes:** 30
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 1

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 1, Likes: 30, Impressions: 1065


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Amine_DeXer
> **Author:** [@Amine_DeXer](https://x.com/Amine_DeXer)  
> **Metrics:** 23 likes · 5 retweets · 6 comments · 960 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Amine_DeXer/status/2097587214007849461](https://x.com/Amine_DeXer/status/2097587214007849461)  


> **Visual Context:** A Twitter/X profile page for 'Charter Foundation' (@CharterFnd), joined June 2026, following 7 accounts with 81 followers, followed by regan, Kurt, ink, and 7 others, displayed over a dark mountain landscape header.  

> 
> "Found something interesting around 
@inkonchain
 that I want to put on your radar early
@CharterFnd
 Charter Foundation.

The account is still basically in stealth, but it already carries the Ink affiliation badge and is followed by INK and several people around the ecosystem

What"


### Post #2 by @MEADGod
> **Author:** [@MEADGod](https://x.com/MEADGod)  
> **Metrics:** 151 likes · 22 retweets · 68 comments · 8.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/MEADGod/status/2097602877925609720](https://x.com/MEADGod/status/2097602877925609720)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a Uniswap-style trading interface displaying the ZZZ token (contract 0x7dbf...eE6a) with two liquidity pools visible: ZZZ/USDG showing $556.1K liquidity, $2.3M volume, $7.6M FDV, and a 5,671% return, alongside ZZZ/ETH with $373.0K liquidity, $2.7M volume, $7.5M FDV, and a 5,313.40% return.

The image relates to the post by illustrating how different trading pools for the same token can route through varying fee/tax structures—relevant to the claim that while Pons allows tax parameters to be adjusted post-launch, certain platforms may inadvertently route trades through higher-tax pools rather than the original Pons-initialized configuration.  

> 
> "Pons doesn’t allow taxes to be changed post-launch.

There is a big group of people claiming that this is the case, but it’s simply wrong.

What I noticed is that some terminals (for whatever reason) route buys and sells through high-tax pools, even though the Pons-initialized"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@weexglobal_ch` (https://x.com/weexglobal_ch)

- `@pitown89` (https://x.com/pitown89)