$UNI
Cooling DownSnapshot Window: 2026-09-02 14:20 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 4, Likes: 47, Impressions: 1713
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 3 source posts analyzed
Robinhood is not ready enough for @WastelandRH Mint Date: 04 Sept 2026, 10:AM EDT Mint Price: 0.0069 Eth (Robinhood) Supply: 3,333 Official link: coming soon, minting on @opensea Follow @WastelandRH Flags up Wasteland people are coming
目前币安整个高度基本上被 #牛来 和 #MARSCOIN 压着 因为只有牛来和火星币上了币安现货才能打开天花板 引来币安的链上牛市 这几天的 #弗洛克 #FLORK 虽然上车晚了 但是上了ALPHA 也吃了10倍 最高冲到27M
Are trading bots getting too much access by default? Been looking into how onchain trading bots handle permissions and it feels like everyone talks about adding more features but not enough about how much control the bot gets. I was reading about how Towns approaches this and their bots can have their own wallets and limited permissions inside a Space. They have a Hyperliquid bot too, which got me thinking about this more from the trading side. If a bot can interact with smart contracts for you, I’d rather be able to restrict exactly what it can do than give it broad access just for convenience. How granular should bot permissions get before the UX becomes a pain?