🤖 AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$ZEROHASH

Fading Quickly

Snapshot Window: 2026-08-26 12:30 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
1
Total Likes
0
Retweets & Quotes
0
Comments
0

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 1

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@alpha_pls

I dunno about anyone else but I still see $HYPE charts showing it going so much lower, with comparisons to GMX (which is nothing like what exists with Hyperliquid and a laughable comparison). Let me just try and help again: - You have a protocol making $4M per day now that vol

The graphic, titled “The Hyperliquid Revenue Stack,” shows total revenue of $1,278,837,624 since Dec. 23, 2024, led by “Perps” at $1.16B. It also lists Sperp ($47.02M), HyperEVM ($14.77M), HYPE Staking ($25.44M), Staked HYPE? ($180M), and a $27.09M figure—illustrating the multiple revenue streams the post argues are often overlooked in bearish $HYPE comparisons to GMX.

AI visual note: The graphic, titled “The Hyperliquid Revenue Stack,” shows total revenue of $1,278,837,624 since Dec. 23, 2024, led by “Perps” at $1.16B. It also lists Sperp ($47.02M), HyperEVM ($14.77M), HYPE Staking ($25.44M), Staked HYPE? ($180M), and a $27.09M figure—illustrating the multiple revenue streams the post argues are often overlooked in bearish $HYPE comparisons to GMX.

Contributing Voices for $ZEROHASH

@NKLinhzk