# $ZEROHASH Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-26 12:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $ZEROHASH  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-26 12:30 UTC (2026-08-26T12:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-26-12-30/crypto/ZEROHASH  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-26-12-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 1
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 1


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @alpha_pls
> **Author:** [@alpha_pls](https://x.com/alpha_pls)  
> **Metrics:** 142 likes · 12 retweets · 22 comments · 11.0K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/alpha_pls/status/2092521830581997776](https://x.com/alpha_pls/status/2092521830581997776)  


> **Visual Context:** The graphic, titled “The Hyperliquid Revenue Stack,” shows total revenue of $1,278,837,624 since Dec. 23, 2024, led by “Perps” at $1.16B. It also lists Sperp ($47.02M), HyperEVM ($14.77M), HYPE Staking ($25.44M), Staked HYPE? ($180M), and a $27.09M figure—illustrating the multiple revenue streams the post argues are often overlooked in bearish $HYPE comparisons to GMX.  

> 
> "I dunno about anyone else but I still see 
$HYPE
 charts showing it going so much lower, with comparisons to GMX (which is nothing like what exists with Hyperliquid and a laughable comparison). 

Let me just try and help again:

- You have a protocol making $4M per day now that vol"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@NKLinhzk` (https://x.com/NKLinhzk)