๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$OVR

Fading Quickly

Snapshot Window: 2026-08-07 08:40 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
991
Total Likes
30
Retweets & Quotes
0
Comments
0

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 30, Impressions: 991

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@coinkritik

#You can check your Baseapp volume and ranking from here. Most checkers show volumes incorrectly. In Basescan, Baseapp transactions appear as internal tx rather than tx, so they don't display properly. You can check your ranking and volume from here in Dune. I'm in the 5,000s

The image shows a Dune Analytics dashboard titled "Top Smart Wallets by Volume (Table) - BaseApp Smart Wallet Volume Leaderboard," displaying wallet `0x036a74505b595c1e40c09877e379cb2b26110545` ranked 5,854 with a UserOp Volume of $427.09, $0 DEX Volume, and a total of $427.09 USD. This relates to the post by @jack77779384, which highlights that BaseApp volumes often appear incorrectly on Basescan due to internal transaction categorization, and this Dune-based leaderboard provides an accurate ranking for smart wallet activity.

AI visual note: The image shows a Dune Analytics dashboard titled "Top Smart Wallets by Volume (Table) - BaseApp Smart Wallet Volume Leaderboard," displaying wallet `0x036a74505b595c1e40c09877e379cb2b26110545` ranked 5,854 with a UserOp Volume of $427.09, $0 DEX Volume, and a total of $427.09 USD. This relates to the post by @jack77779384, which highlights that BaseApp volumes often appear incorrectly on Basescan due to internal transaction categorization, and this Dune-based leaderboard provides an accurate ranking for smart wallet activity.

Contributing Voices for $OVR

@JanPapaj