# $OVR Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-08-07 08:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $OVR  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-08-07 08:40 UTC (2026-08-07T08:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-08-40/crypto/OVR  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-08-07-08-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 991
- **Likes:** 30
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 30, Impressions: 991


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @coinkritik
> **Author:** [@coinkritik](https://x.com/coinkritik)  
> **Metrics:** 32 likes · 2 retweets · 3 comments · 2.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/coinkritik/status/2085609346843414904](https://x.com/coinkritik/status/2085609346843414904)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a Dune Analytics dashboard titled "Top Smart Wallets by Volume (Table) - BaseApp Smart Wallet Volume Leaderboard," displaying wallet `0x036a74505b595c1e40c09877e379cb2b26110545` ranked 5,854 with a UserOp Volume of $427.09, $0 DEX Volume, and a total of $427.09 USD. This relates to the post by @jack77779384, which highlights that BaseApp volumes often appear incorrectly on Basescan due to internal transaction categorization, and this Dune-based leaderboard provides an accurate ranking for smart wallet activity.  

> 
> "#You can check your Baseapp volume and ranking from here. Most checkers show volumes incorrectly. 

In Basescan, Baseapp transactions appear as internal tx rather than tx, so they don't display properly. You can check your ranking and volume from here in Dune. I'm in the 5,000s"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@JanPapaj` (https://x.com/JanPapaj)