$OSMO Catalyst Posts
April 16, 2026Single-day social intelligence recap and verified catalyst posts · ← Back to $OSMO Profile · Market Rankings
💬 Curated Viral Posts & Community Evidence
7 source posts analyzed· 2026-04-16T21:27:40+00:00As predicted one month ago, $ATOM / $OSMO prop rejected - despite Osmosis governance voting for it to pass on their side.
· 2026-04-16T19:03:02+00:00The problem with the merger deal was the $OSMO token. Anyone voting YES can buy it with their own $$$ Buying it with $ATOM CP would have been stupid… and the community should start questioning the validators who voted YES for that stupidity & remove them from the active set.
· 2026-04-16T20:54:29+00:00Proposal 1029 rejected. The idea may have been right. The underwriting wasn’t. The @cosmoshub Hub does need a clearer path to native revenue / value capture. the market was not willing to empty community pool on an @osmosis deal with too many open questions around pricing,
· 2026-04-16T05:07:57+00:00The Osmosis x Cosmos Hub Merge Proposal is a farce. Validators not acting in the interest of delegators, instead just going after those tasty bribes. All in the open. Zero shame.
· 2026-04-16T09:39:28+00:00I sold my last $ATOM years ago and my last $OSMO last year. So I have no skin in this game, but it still stucks. A Cosmos without Osmosis is not an ecosystem I want to be in.
· 2026-04-16T14:48:22+00:00Cosmos Hub Proposal #1029 has been rejected. This proposal aimed to pursue the acquisition and merger of @osmosis into @cosmoshub . However, we voted in favor of this proposal, as we believed it was in the best interest of both the Osmosis and Cosmos communities.
· 2026-04-16T01:00:39+00:00We like the Osmo