$OPUS Catalyst Posts
June 01, 2026Single-day social intelligence recap and verified catalyst posts · ← Back to $OPUS Profile · Market Rankings
💬 Curated Viral Posts & Community Evidence
5 source posts analyzed· 2026-06-01T03:34:33+00:00MinMax3 just dropped! SWE Bench Pro: 59.0% Terminal Bench 2.1: 66.0% SVG Bench: 63.7% BrowseComp: 85.5% GDPval Rubrics: 74.7% MCP Atlas: 74.2% OSWorld Verified: 70.0% I am in disbelief that they’re open sourcing a model that beats both Opus and GPT 5.5 on BrowseComp and SVG
AI visual analysis: A line graph shows the percentage of students who prefer using SWE Bench Pro as their preferred software for learning compared to other options such as GCP, Terminal Bench, and MCP Atlas. The graph displays that SWE Bench Pro has a 59% preference among students, while other options have lower percentages ranging from 66.0% to 85.5%. The post also mentions the release of SWE Bench pro, a new model with improved features, which might be the reason for this preference shift.
· 2026-06-01T19:05:08+00:00OMG WE BROKE 1% ON ARC AGI 3 Opus 4.8 - 1.5% $10k worth of tokens
AI visual analysis: The image features a screenshot from an ArcAgile leaderboard, displaying various scores for different games. The leaderboard seems to be set up so that each game has its own individual score line, and the games are arranged based on their scores rather than their titles or players. It is likely to display information about cost per token (COT), which indicates how much an item is worth in tokens. In this particular screenshot, there's a game called "Closest to You", having a high score of 4.8 and a low score of 1.5%. Another popular game on the leaderboard has an average score of 3.49 points with a cost of $10k. The graph also includes text that says "OMG BROKE 1% ON ARC AGI 3 OPUS 4.8 - 1.5% $10k worth of tokens". This information is useful for those interested in knowing the costs and scores associated with different games on the leaderboard, as well as their relative popularity among players.
· 2026-06-01T08:00:21+00:00web3 people! Happy new month!!! we starting this month with a win 70$ playing @LootSurvivor opus yield dungeon @OpusMoney initial investment 16$ The opus yield dungeon is the first implementation i have seen merging decentralized finance into web3 game. Devs , players ,
AI visual analysis: The image shows a computer screen displaying a webpage with a green background and white text. The title of the webpage reads "web3 people! Happy new month!!! we starting this month with a win 70$ playing opus yield dungeon @LootSurvivor opus yield dungeon @OpusMoney initial investment 16$ The opus yield dungeon is the first implementation i have seen merging decentralized finance into web3 game.". This webpage appears to be related to a gaming platform or game development, as it features information about a game called "opus yield" and its associated rewards for players who participate in the game.
· 2026-06-01T14:11:24+00:00My bro dropping alpha as always Just hopped on the Max plan too and grabbed Opus 4.8, already spinning up a Polymarket bot project with it From here it’s pure imagination: Opus 4.8 + Polymarket = agents that scan events, price risk and suggest trades for you
AI visual analysis: In this screenshot of a computer screen, there are two pricing plans being displayed with different costs associated with them. One plan is labeled as "Pro" and costs $20 per month, while the other one is labeled as "Max" for $200 per month. The main focus of the image appears to be related to these pricing plans rather than the content of the post that accompanies it.
· 2026-06-01T18:33:31+00:004 days after launch and Opus 4.8 still has not hit LMArena Interestingly, market is pretty bearish on it overtaking 4.6, which is great news for Gemini if it holds
