๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$NEAR

Cooling Down

Snapshot Window: 2026-10-04 10:20 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
2
Total Impressions
394
Total Likes
5
Retweets & Quotes
0
Comments
0

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 5, Impressions: 394

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed

@WhaleHunterReal

BASICALLY EVERY CRYPTO CAN 10x IN THE NEXT YEAR. SOME WILL EVEN 100x.

Should the Hub have a formal emergency procedure after the Neutron exploit halt? I'm studying Cosmos governance for a blockchain course and I'm trying to understand the community's view on last month's events. After the Neutron governance attack, validators halted the Hub for about a day and moved roughly 1.2M ATOM from the attacker into a multisig. It was coordinated off-chain, without an on-chain vote, and the patched binary wasn't publicly released at first. On one hand it clearly prevented a bigger loss. On the other hand it shows that 2/3 of validators can freeze funds when they decide it's necessary. How do you see it? Was this the right call, and should governance define a formal emergency process so the next case isn't handled ad hoc?

Contributing Voices for $NEAR

@SmokeyHosoda @fyrechartz