πŸ€– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$META

Trending Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-09-22 17:10 UTC Β· ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
3
Total Impressions
3.1K
Total Likes
27
Retweets & Quotes
2
Comments
2

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 2, Retweets: 2, Likes: 27, Impressions: 3064

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 3 source posts analyzed

@popular_sui

New here? Welcome. Here's what you're holding with $POP: Team share: 8.5%, locked and vesting over 90 days 100% of creator fees buy $POP back and burn it 26.2M $POP burned so far (220 buybacks, 407 SUI) Don't take our word for it. Check the chain.

A promotional graphic for POP on SUI Mainnet showing statistics: 8.5% team share locked, 100% fees to buyback & burn, and 26.2M POP burned so far, with text 'NEW HERE? READ THE RECEIPTS.'

AI visual note: A promotional graphic for POP on SUI Mainnet showing statistics: 8.5% team share locked, 100% fees to buyback & burn, and 26.2M POP burned so far, with text 'NEW HERE? READ THE RECEIPTS.'

@InternLiminal

Hyperliquid Strategies is not slowing down They now hold: > $3,200,000,000 worth of $HYPE > 33,600,000 $HYPE > ~15% of the circulating supply > +3% of total supply They want all your HYPE, position accordingly. Hyperliquid.

The Hyperliquid Strategies team celebrates at the Nasdaq with confetti falling around them as they ring the bell, marking the company's milestone of accumulating over $3.2 billion worth of HYPE tokens (33.6 million tokens, ~15% of circulating supply), positioning themselves as a major holder of the HYPE token.

AI visual note: The Hyperliquid Strategies team celebrates at the Nasdaq with confetti falling around them as they ring the bell, marking the company's milestone of accumulating over $3.2 billion worth of HYPE tokens (33.6 million tokens, ~15% of circulating supply), positioning themselves as a major holder of the HYPE token.

@Im_IrushiK

Opus 5.5 released : Benchmaxed like Opus 5, or genuinely above Astra? If these numbers translate to real world agentic coding, this isn’t a small upgrade. The gap looks way too big to dismiss as benchmark optimization alone. The real test now is whether Opus 5.5 can hold that

A line graph titled "Terminal-Bench 4.0" plotting "Score (%) vs Cost per attempt (USD, log scale)", comparing models including Opus 5.5, Fable 5.1, Opus 5, GPT-6 Astra, and GPT-5.6 Sol.

AI visual note: A line graph titled "Terminal-Bench 4.0" plotting "Score (%) vs Cost per attempt (USD, log scale)", comparing models including Opus 5.5, Fable 5.1, Opus 5, GPT-6 Astra, and GPT-5.6 Sol.

Contributing Voices for $META

@PhoenixTrade @cakemeta @pravijn