🤖 AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$NEAR

Cooling Down

Snapshot Window: 2026-09-09 10:50 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
2
Total Impressions
48
Total Likes
4
Retweets & Quotes
0
Comments
0

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 4, Impressions: 48

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed

@0xmani

Definitely not, scams don’t count

@DefiIgnas

Didn't see CT celebrate EF excluding ETH inflation reduction EIP from its Hegotá recommendations* The EIP-8363 got UNANIMOUS block: 'declined for inclusion' with the score of '0 (4)' meaning zero votes across four submitted grades. The lowest tier. EF says this isn't a

A "Hegotá - EF Protocol tier list" chart categorizes Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) into tiers S, A, B, C, DFI, and TBD based on alignment with the protocol's philosophy, including specific EIP numbers like EIP-7736, EIP-7708, EIP-2717, and EIP-8363 (the latter marked as "Decline" for Frame Transactions). The image complements the post by providing visual evidence of where EIP-8363 was ranked in the EF's tier system, which scored 0/4 votes ("declined for inclusion") in a "Withdraws BLS Withdrawal" category, supporting the post's criticism of CT's lack of recognition for this poor rating.

AI visual note: A "Hegotá - EF Protocol tier list" chart categorizes Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) into tiers S, A, B, C, DFI, and TBD based on alignment with the protocol's philosophy, including specific EIP numbers like EIP-7736, EIP-7708, EIP-2717, and EIP-8363 (the latter marked as "Decline" for Frame Transactions). The image complements the post by providing visual evidence of where EIP-8363 was ranked in the EF's tier system, which scored 0/4 votes ("declined for inclusion") in a "Withdraws BLS Withdrawal" category, supporting the post's criticism of CT's lack of recognition for this poor rating.

Contributing Voices for $NEAR

@ruecatsolana @0x_Zhuang