$BAYC
StableSnapshot Window: 2026-09-06 21:50 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 12, Retweets: 3, Likes: 19, Impressions: 597
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed
Everyone says SOL is cheaper than Arbitrum. Here’s why Robinhood picked the “expensive” route. The hot take right now: Solana is way cheaper, so Robinhood “should’ve” built there. Anatoly Yakovenko even ran the math: the 10% revenue share Robinhood pays Arbitrum could cover Solana fees several times over and still leave room to subsidize users. But Steven Goldfeder’s reply hits a different angle: on Arbitrum Orbit, Robinhood keeps roughly 90% of sequencer revenue and only sends 10% back to the Arbitrum ecosystem (8% to the DAO treasury, 2% to the Developer Guild). On Solana, those same fees go to validators; Robinhood would retain none of the base-layer fees and would have to subsidize every user out of pocket if it wanted gasless UX.