🤖 AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$BAYC

Stable

Snapshot Window: 2026-09-06 21:50 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
597
Total Likes
19
Retweets & Quotes
3
Comments
12

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 12, Retweets: 3, Likes: 19, Impressions: 597

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@reddit

Everyone says SOL is cheaper than Arbitrum. Here’s why Robinhood picked the “expensive” route. The hot take right now: Solana is way cheaper, so Robinhood “should’ve” built there. Anatoly Yakovenko even ran the math: the 10% revenue share Robinhood pays Arbitrum could cover Solana fees several times over and still leave room to subsidize users. But Steven Goldfeder’s reply hits a different angle: on Arbitrum Orbit, Robinhood keeps roughly 90% of sequencer revenue and only sends 10% back to the Arbitrum ecosystem (8% to the DAO treasury, 2% to the Developer Guild). On Solana, those same fees go to validators; Robinhood would retain none of the base-layer fees and would have to subsidize every user out of pocket if it wanted gasless UX.

Contributing Voices for $BAYC

@avocadovault