πŸ€– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$WORLD

Heating Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-09-06 21:10 UTC Β· ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
143
Total Likes
16
Retweets & Quotes
1
Comments
7

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 7, Retweets: 1, Likes: 16, Impressions: 143

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

Yeah, my liquid.network nodes are running a different version of elements than blockstream.info, which is related to the consensus split: seems this is the β€œvalid” transaction which caused the consensus split, which obviously should not have been allowed

A block explorer interface displays a list of "Confidential" transaction IDs alongside details showing a peg-out of 3,996,019,349,922 LBTC with transaction fees of 0.00000177 LBTC, illustrating the controversial transaction that triggered a consensus split between the liquid.network and blockstream.info Elements node versions.

AI visual note: A block explorer interface displays a list of "Confidential" transaction IDs alongside details showing a peg-out of 3,996,019,349,922 LBTC with transaction fees of 0.00000177 LBTC, illustrating the controversial transaction that triggered a consensus split between the liquid.network and blockstream.info Elements node versions.

Contributing Voices for $WORLD

@miss_aeva_ji