$PONS

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 21, Retweets: 1, Likes: 45, Impressions: 1904

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@reddit

Source Post ↗

Secp256k1: Solving Partial WIF vs Decimal I have a question that I can’t seem to find an answer to, although I have an idea of what the answer might be. Context: I have the public key. I have a missing part of the private key in decimal, for example: 1234567891011121314151617\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*00000000000000000 The WIF will show me the beginning, but the end will be uncertain since the missing digits are in the middle. However, in decimal, I know that the ending 00000000000000000 means that the number is a multiple of 10¹⁷. Is there any way to reduce the number of possible candidates for the ending of the WIF? Or does that information not help at all?

❤️ 1 likes · 🔁 0 retweets · 💬 0 comments 👁️ 100 views

Contributing Voices for $PONS

Other Trending Tokens in this Snapshot