🤖 AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$AVAX

Heating Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-08-28 19:20 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
2
Total Impressions
3.5K
Total Likes
161
Retweets & Quotes
5
Comments
33

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 33, Retweets: 5, Likes: 161, Impressions: 3477

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed

@loshmi

Blokyz prediction was right they opened up at 0.11eth floor price which marks 3 almost 4x per mint congrats everyone now send it to 1eth!

The image shows the "Original Blokyz" NFT collection page on Ethereum, displaying a floor price of 0.11 ETH, a top offer of 0.128 WETH, 24H volume of 19.18 ETH, and 1,830 unique owners—confirming the post's prediction that the collection opened at 0.11 ETH, with the creator celebrating the ~3-4x gain per mint.

AI visual note: The image shows the "Original Blokyz" NFT collection page on Ethereum, displaying a floor price of 0.11 ETH, a top offer of 0.128 WETH, 24H volume of 19.18 ETH, and 1,830 unique owners—confirming the post's prediction that the collection opened at 0.11 ETH, with the creator celebrating the ~3-4x gain per mint.

@BeccaAmilee

The next place Bitcoiners exhibit disappointing group think is @CrowdHealth . 14 people immediately liked a solution that would literally bankrupt me. 2 years before they pay on pre-existing conditions, and in year 3, up to $25k. So, as an individual, it's completely unusable.

The image shows a Twitter exchange where BeccaAmilee (@BeccaAmilee) highlights a 42% increase in team medical insurance costs in a year, while CrowdHealth (@JoinCrowdHealth) counters by noting their members experienced about a 5% decrease. This exchange directly relates to the post criticizing Bitcoiners for supporting CrowdHealth without considering its limitations, such as delayed coverage for pre-existing conditions and capped payouts that could leave individuals financially vulnerable.

AI visual note: The image shows a Twitter exchange where BeccaAmilee (@BeccaAmilee) highlights a 42% increase in team medical insurance costs in a year, while CrowdHealth (@JoinCrowdHealth) counters by noting their members experienced about a 5% decrease. This exchange directly relates to the post criticizing Bitcoiners for supporting CrowdHealth without considering its limitations, such as delayed coverage for pre-existing conditions and capped payouts that could leave individuals financially vulnerable.

Contributing Voices for $AVAX

@occoxbt @AvaxTeam1