$SLEEP
Cooling DownSnapshot Window: 2026-08-27 05:40 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 41, Retweets: 6, Likes: 42, Impressions: 732
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed
Checking transfers really can't just rely on verifying the first 4 and last 4 digits of the address anymore. While analyzing on-chain data, I found that this guy lost 2.5 million U in 5 minutes. After receiving 2.5 million U, the guy transferred 100 U to the destination address
AI visual note: The image displays an on-chain transaction history showing a sequence of transfers: a victim address (starting with THdMx8mSTWm...76ehHX1) received 2,527,962.34 USDT, then sent 100 USDT to a legitimate-looking destination address (TDDD34bLEGg84...), followed by an outgoing 1.01 USDT to a spoofed address (TDDDH26zb2Nh...NrCr9Ps), and finally lost 2,527,862.34 USDT to that same spoofed address. The bottom highlights the correct destination address versus the fraudulent counterfeit address, illustrating how an address poisoning attack—where scammers mimic the first and last characters of a legitimate address—tricked the victim into sending 2.5M USDT to the wrong address.
If you're to trade stocks Which of this would you pick ? - Traditional Stocks or @Mexc Stocks
AI visual note: A promotional graphic by MEXC and Dekingweb3 comparing "Traditional Stocks" (depicted with a chart and coins) versus "Mexc Stocks" (shown as a shopping cart filled with logos of tech companies like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, and AMD).