$REKT
Fading QuicklySnapshot Window: 2026-08-24 16:40 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 9, Retweets: 4, Likes: 31, Impressions: 1291
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed
got good feedback on a preference for these to go to auction instead of randomly distributed after acquisition original thought was random distro puts the nft in the hands of a few contributors and gives them the potential upside of price discovery vs an auction would likely
![]()
AI visual note: The image shows the "MEGARIA" website with a pink furry logo and a "FWAIR PFPs" NFT drop card displaying a countdown timer of "4h 33m 21s" until support opens, a "0 ETH" total raised, and a minimum deposit of 0.01 ETH. The post suggests the creator is reconsidering their initial random distribution model—where every NFT won by the pool would go to one depositor picked by random draw (as shown in the image)—in favor of an auction format based on community feedback.
CORRECTION NOTICE Today I came across a post that's been copy-pasted around purely to farm likes and shares. It claims that the "smart contract has been audited." But when I checked directly on the official repo: github.com/PiNetwork/Smar … Here's what I actually found: The
![]()
AI visual note: A screenshot of a Cryptoleakvn tweet announcing that Pi Smart Contracts have passed a third-party audit, featuring an image of the Pi Network GitHub repository with Nicolas Kokkalis listed as founder—though the original post corrects this claim, stating no such audit confirmation was actually found on the official GitHub repo.