$ZERGLNFT1453
Cooling DownSnapshot Window: 2026-08-18 03:20 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 2, Impressions: 24
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed
None of my interviews so far has caused as much controversy as the one with @robin_linus . You can be against larger blocks – there are good reasons for that. But historically, one point is pretty undisputed: Satoshi Nakamoto himself did not see the blocksize limit of that time
AI visual note: The image shows a BitcoinTalk forum post #4 from user "jgarzik" on October 3, 2010, in which he argues that the block size limit should be increased as a "marketing thing" to make the network appear capable of supporting high transaction rates, quoting Satoshi's willingness to phase in such a change later. The image supports the post's claim that Satoshi himself did not view the original block size limit as a permanent constraint, providing historical evidence from one of Bitcoin's earliest developers supporting larger blocks.