๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$DOS

Trending Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-08-13 09:30 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
351
Total Likes
7
Retweets & Quotes
1
Comments
4

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 4, Retweets: 1, Likes: 7, Impressions: 351

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@real_j3nny

A 4B model trained specifically for crypto operations scored 50 on @Velvet_Capital crypto skills benchmark, ahead of Qwen3.5-27B at 45, DeepSeek-V4 at 40, and Llama-3.3-70B at 32. What I find even more interesting is the jump from 23 in the base model to 50 after task-specific

A scatter plot titled "Score vs model size โ€” smaller, specialised, better" displays benchmark scores (0-100) against model size on a logarithmic scale, showing Velvet Flash 0.1 (4B parameters) leading at 50, followed by Qwen3.5 at 45, Llama at 32, Gemma at 31, and Mistral at 20, illustrating how a smaller task-specific model outperforms much larger general-purpose models on crypto skills evaluation.

AI visual note: A scatter plot titled "Score vs model size โ€” smaller, specialised, better" displays benchmark scores (0-100) against model size on a logarithmic scale, showing Velvet Flash 0.1 (4B parameters) leading at 50, followed by Qwen3.5 at 45, Llama at 32, Gemma at 31, and Mistral at 20, illustrating how a smaller task-specific model outperforms much larger general-purpose models on crypto skills evaluation.

Contributing Voices for $DOS

@erjie22