$HASH
Heating UpSnapshot Window: 2026-08-08 20:30 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 5, Retweets: 2, Likes: 7, Impressions: 349
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed
如果是这样我就不太认可了，而且觉得有点双标和道德绑架了 是不是可以探讨一下？ 第一个观点说的是反正只要自己也参与了最后一起亏那撸哥就认为他没错不应该被喷。所以意思如果广告费收了2000u，拿1000u出来买币喊单带动大家情绪一起干然后亏钱了这就没有责任了？
AI visual note: The image shows a Chinese-language post from user "memory" (@The Wooo) dated June 6th, expressing frustration about two announcements, questioning why all assets must be forcibly converted to JU at 7U's price rather than allowing users to keep their original U or BTC holdings. The accompanying post appears to be a follow-up critique discussing double standards, referencing a scenario about advertising fees and collective losses, which relates to the image's expression of dissatisfaction and confusion about forced asset conversion.