๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$RIVER

Stable

Snapshot Window: 2026-08-07 00:40 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
66
Total Likes
1
Retweets & Quotes
0
Comments
3

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 3, Retweets: 0, Likes: 1, Impressions: 66

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@mckbrando

Why is this comparing with Terra and Opus, but not Sol

The image displays three bar charts comparing coding benchmark scores: Terminal-Bench 2.1 (with scores ranging from 76.2% to 88.7%, including Opus 4.1, GPT-5.1, and Sonnet 4.5), DeepSWE 1.1 (40.0% to 65.0%, featuring Opus 4.1, GPT-5.1, Sonnet 4.5, and Gemini 3.0 Flash), and Meta Internal Coding Bench (63.9% to 79.4%, with Opus 4.1, Sonnet 4.5, and Gemini 3.0 Flash). The post's question about why Sol isn't included highlights that "Sonnet 4.5 (Terra)" appears prominently in all three benchmarks, suggesting the comparison is designed to showcase a specific company's models against competitors like Opus and GPT rather than including all available models.

AI visual note: The image displays three bar charts comparing coding benchmark scores: Terminal-Bench 2.1 (with scores ranging from 76.2% to 88.7%, including Opus 4.1, GPT-5.1, and Sonnet 4.5), DeepSWE 1.1 (40.0% to 65.0%, featuring Opus 4.1, GPT-5.1, Sonnet 4.5, and Gemini 3.0 Flash), and Meta Internal Coding Bench (63.9% to 79.4%, with Opus 4.1, Sonnet 4.5, and Gemini 3.0 Flash). The post's question about why Sol isn't included highlights that "Sonnet 4.5 (Terra)" appears prominently in all three benchmarks, suggesting the comparison is designed to showcase a specific company's models against competitors like Opus and GPT rather than including all available models.

Contributing Voices for $RIVER

@blockphd7