🤖 AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$NINEHOOD

Trending Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-07-31 03:30 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
2
Total Impressions
4.9K
Total Likes
81
Retweets & Quotes
27
Comments
23

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 23, Retweets: 27, Likes: 81, Impressions: 4904

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed

@realkaicrypto

never a bad time to accumulate the chaos on $CLIVE

@0xnobi

There's a major misconception with the recent Uniswap fee switch proposal. Only vanilla Uni v4 pools have a protocol fee. Uni v4 pools with third party hooks do not. So if you were worried about Pons or its token creators losing out on potential revenue, you don't have to.

A slide titled "This proposal activates fees on three pool families:" outlines how the Uniswap v4 fee switch applies differently to Static pools, CCA pools, and Aggregator hook pools—with aggregator hooks paying a flat 3bp/10bp (or 1bp/3bp on Base) after a 25x multiplier, rather than a dynamic fee curve. This supports the post's point that only vanilla v4 pools face the protocol fee, while third-party hook pools like Pons operate under separate, flat fee structures.

AI visual note: A slide titled "This proposal activates fees on three pool families:" outlines how the Uniswap v4 fee switch applies differently to Static pools, CCA pools, and Aggregator hook pools—with aggregator hooks paying a flat 3bp/10bp (or 1bp/3bp on Base) after a 25x multiplier, rather than a dynamic fee curve. This supports the post's point that only vanilla v4 pools face the protocol fee, while third-party hook pools like Pons operate under separate, flat fee structures.

Contributing Voices for $NINEHOOD

@CryptoEmpressX @LeslieM0tta