🤖 AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$FLR

Cooling Down

Snapshot Window: 2026-07-25 23:20 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
536
Total Likes
8
Retweets & Quotes
2
Comments
1

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 2, Likes: 8, Impressions: 536

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@intangiblecoins

many have missed this great section added to CLARITY protection for self custody coins from being deemed “lost” under abandoned property laws due to onchain inactivity or dormancy, with federal preemption over state laws as well ‘noah doe’ wouldn’t like to see this

The image displays Section 20216 of a legislative bill titled "Protection of Self-Custodied Digital Assets," which defines self-custodied digital assets and includes a highlighted provision (subsection (b)(1)) stating that no digital asset lawfully held in self-custody can be deemed abandoned, unclaimed, or subject to forfeiture/escheat solely due to inactivity or dormancy, with federal preemption over state laws under subsection (b)(2). This visually confirms the post's claim about protections preventing self-custody coins from being treated as "lost" under abandoned property laws based on onchain inactivity.

AI visual note: The image displays Section 20216 of a legislative bill titled "Protection of Self-Custodied Digital Assets," which defines self-custodied digital assets and includes a highlighted provision (subsection (b)(1)) stating that no digital asset lawfully held in self-custody can be deemed abandoned, unclaimed, or subject to forfeiture/escheat solely due to inactivity or dormancy, with federal preemption over state laws under subsection (b)(2). This visually confirms the post's claim about protections preventing self-custody coins from being treated as "lost" under abandoned property laws based on onchain inactivity.

Contributing Voices for $FLR

@xrp_4_lyf