$RWA

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 1, Retweets: 2, Likes: 2, Impressions: 1015

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@reddit

Source Post ↗

Machine-checked that Kyber's reference-C forward NTT matches FIPS 203, and why the smaller modulus made it easier than Dilithium I've been verifying post-quantum reference implementations against their FIPS specs with a SAW → Cryptol → Isabelle pipeline. Just finished ML-KEM-512 (Kyber) forward NTT on the unmodified PQClean clean C: SAW proves the C bit-exact to a Cryptol model, Isabelle proves that model equals the FIPS 203 transform (the incomplete NTT, 128 degree-2 residues mod 3329). No sorry/admit, reproducible from one command, CI-green. Prior art, up front: Kyber’s NTT has been verified before (Apple corecrypto, the EasyCrypt “Formally Verifying Kyber” line, libcrux/hax). This isn’t a first; my contribution is an end‑to‑end, machine‑checked connection between the unmodified PQClean reference C and the FIPS 203 NTT spec, plus one concrete contrast with my earlier Dilithium (ML‑DSA) proof.

❤️ 12 likes · 🔁 0 retweets · 💬 0 comments 👁️ 1.2K views

Contributing Voices for $RWA

Other Trending Tokens in this Snapshot