๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$0XSERO

Heating Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-07-22 12:50 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
3.9K
Total Likes
29
Retweets & Quotes
2
Comments
12

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 12, Retweets: 2, Likes: 29, Impressions: 3862

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@AchillasCrypt

Everyone assumes the first users of AI agents and the Internet Court will be everyday consumers. @TziokasV disagrees. He argues that Banks, financial institutions, and enterprises not retail users will likely lead the AI agent revolution. Why? Watch what he said about it [Spoken audio]: One of my code takes, I think you alluded to that point earlier, is that I'm still not sure that the agent economy will be driven by consumers. We were discussing before about the average person, the average Joe, as we call it, having an agent and giving him $10 to go out and book a hotel. Yes, that seems to be the most logical use case for agents right now. But in my opinion, there is also another universe which is that institutions will be using agents for trading, for interacting, for transacting. And it's what we see in their own chain economy. I think many people who are on crypto twitter saw the post from Jesse from base, who is a great builder and someone who is very well respected in the industry. And he pretty much acknowledged that on chain economy right now is not about trading institutions, RWAs and not so much the social part right so you know the adoption comes from institutions not from real users and not real not from individual users that's the word so going back to my hot tank I do believe that a chain economy is something that makes a lot of sense for institutions right and if that's the case if my thesis is correct or partially correct this cannot be done in public chains. I don't think I need to explain in many days why, but the same reason that right now people do not have access to the books of JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, US Bank, why have access to their books on chain. They should be private for many different reasons for business, continuity reasons, for competitive intelligence reasons, for compliance reasons, so forth So again, privacy is a prerequisite for institutions. A genetic economy makes a lot of sense because those guys, the big institutions, they do many repeated tasks every day across a multitude of different books of the economy. So I do foresee a future where a genetic economy will be easier and more rapidly adopting adopting by the Goldman Sachsies of the world, and music them as an example, rather than the average Joe who has his own kind of concerns and worries about what is safe or not.

None

Contributing Voices for $0XSERO

@0xSero