๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$NFT

Trending Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-07-21 23:00 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
3
Total Impressions
468
Total Likes
25
Retweets & Quotes
1
Comments
16

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 16, Retweets: 1, Likes: 25, Impressions: 468

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed

@arcvoxeel

whitelist live โœฎโ‹†ห™ โ‚ŠหšโŠน แฐ” arcfrogs.xyz

I mapped which wallet defense stops which agent-wallet drain (runnable, one command) An agent that holds a wallet decides in English but signs calldata or a typed message. A poisoned tool can make the plan look fine and the signature drain the wallet. I built eight drains (approvals, EIP-2612 permits, EIP-712 orders, EIP-7702 delegations, Permit2) and scored each against a ladder of seven defenses, from a plan reviewer up to transaction and signature simulation. `./run.sh` runs the whole thing on a local fork. Rendering the counterparty, amount, and recipient of a signature closes five of eight. Simulation adds nothing on top. One on-chain timing race (arm the contract after the dry-run, before inclusion) survives everything.