๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$ODDCATS

Cooling Down

Snapshot Window: 2026-07-21 18:30 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
1.7K
Total Likes
40
Retweets & Quotes
5
Comments
19

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 19, Retweets: 5, Likes: 40, Impressions: 1682

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@polyfactual

"Most crypto protocols give founders the treasury on day one. MetaDAO doesn't." @allocateur on why @MetaDAOProject ownership coins have a model that is actually safer for both founders and investors. David is also building Ownership Capital, a MetaDAO-native activist fund, In [Spoken audio]: The Treasury is not being given to the team right away, right? So the Treasury is being governed and the team cannot really spend more than their monthly allowance. So let's say you raise $5 million and your monthly allowance is $200,000, right? So you're getting only the $200,000 every month, right? Without any additional voting or proposals. That's one very important thing. And the reason it's important is that it's alive, things happen, maybe at some point after five months you are demotivated, it's not working and you actually want to do something else as a founder. Well, one way to go is to tell the market about it, that for some reason you don't want to proceed with your startup. Or the market thinks that you aren't really pushing the product enough or like you are focused on something else. So the market can propose a new proposal to liquidate as a treasury, right? So in that case, out of five million dollars, four million dollars are going back to the token holders, right? So essentially as an investor or like talk token holder, you're getting 80% of your investment back on the venture that ventures that didn't really work, right? So I would say that this kind of case is very new to crypto, where you would usually put some money in the project, like buy a coin, and that you literally don't know where the money is going, how it's being spent. And most probably, there is a lesser probability that you're going to be able to get it back if the project does not really do any progress on the development path. Yeah, so that's one, right? Treasury control. The other thing is before we would usually have equity holders on one side for a project, and those were usually the investors and the team, and then a project would have a token, and the token, you know, the token might have had some buybacks or a portion of revenue, but pretty much the primary decision power was giving to the equity holders, right? And then something would usually go to the token holders. So Metadow is changing that where through having, well, the legal structure of it is that there is a segregated portfolio company in Kaiman under Metadow's structure pretty much. So every new company that is raising money has to transfer all of their IP to the entity in Kaiman, right? So in a way, the IP is now owned by the token holders, right? So if something goes wrong, the token holders can always, in fact, even even find a new team to lead a project.

Contributing Voices for $ODDCATS

@focusonFON