$STAR
StableSnapshot Window: 2026-07-16 09:10 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 5, Retweets: 2, Likes: 14, Impressions: 2991
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed
Is this propf that Satoshi would have been PRO-BIP110? You tell me. [Spoken audio]: I know, most developers don't like their software being forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case. Satoshi, quoting Gavin Andreessen from June 17, 2010, 07.58.14 p.m. I admire the flexibility of the scripts in a transaction scheme, but my evil little mind immediately starts to think of ways I might abuse it. abuse it. I could encode all sorts of interesting information in the transaction out script, and if non-hacked clients validated and then ignored those transactions, it would be a useful covert broadcast communication channel. That's a cool feature, until it gets popular and someone decides it would be fun to flood the payment network with millions of transactions to transfer the latest Lady Gaga video to all their friends. Satoshi in response. That's one of the reasons for transaction fees. There are other things we can do if necessary. Satoshi quoting Laszlo from June 17, 2010, 06.50.31 p.m. How long have you been working on this design, Satoshi? It seems very well thought out, not the kind of thing you just sit down and code up without doing a lot of brainstorming and discussion on it first. Everyone has the obvious questions looking for holes in it, but it's holding up well, smiley face. Satoshi in response. Since 2007, at some point I became convinced that
