🤖 AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$SPCX

Trending Up

Snapshot Window: 2026-07-14 22:20 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
102
Total Likes
0
Retweets & Quotes
0
Comments
0

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 102

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@Fricoben

I investigated 99 DeFi protocol incidents reported in 2026. 7 graphs showing the state of DeFi security 1. The most common DeFi exploit is not the biggest one.

Two donut charts compare the frequency vs. financial impact of 99 DeFi protocol incidents across three categories: **Protocol logic** (62 incidents, $137.6M–19%), **OPSEC/authority** (18 incidents, $423.8M–46%), and **External trust boundary** (19 incidents, $351.7M–39%), totaling $913M in gross losses. The contrast reveals that while protocol logic bugs occur most often (63%), OPSEC/authority failures—though rarer—account for the largest share of losses ($423.8M), supporting the post's claim that the *most common* DeFi exploit isn't the *most costly*.

AI visual note: Two donut charts compare the frequency vs. financial impact of 99 DeFi protocol incidents across three categories: **Protocol logic** (62 incidents, $137.6M–19%), **OPSEC/authority** (18 incidents, $423.8M–46%), and **External trust boundary** (19 incidents, $351.7M–39%), totaling $913M in gross losses. The contrast reveals that while protocol logic bugs occur most often (63%), OPSEC/authority failures—though rarer—account for the largest share of losses ($423.8M), supporting the post's claim that the *most common* DeFi exploit isn't the *most costly*.

Contributing Voices for $SPCX

@Gate_Espanol