๐Ÿค– AI Agent Friendly: This page is available in clean token-optimized Markdown.
View as .md

$PUMP

Stable

Snapshot Window: 2026-07-12 22:20 UTC ยท โ† Back to Crypto Overview

Tracked Posts
1
Total Impressions
1.9K
Total Likes
26
Retweets & Quotes
5
Comments
0

Social Momentum Summary

Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 5, Likes: 26, Impressions: 1881

Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed

@LuminaraGo

probably needed a hug but started looking at the invisible bills behind crypto apps and how @cysic_xyz can cut it check Cysic Venus upgrade breakdown spoiler: if you want to be a builder, not just consumer, you don't wanna miss it what one app would you like to build? [Spoken audio]: What if I told you that Venus upgrade on Sysic could lower your cost? But you probably missed it. Stay with me and till the end of this video, you'll be ahead of most people who still don't get it. Here's the issue. Many blockchain apps burned a massive amount of computing power just to prove that one calculation was right. It's like more paperwork than the actual work. One proof costs 7.76 kilo joules. That's the energy bill. That's what everyone pays. Sysic went after that bill. They took Venus, they ZKVM and moved the full prover onto FPGA. Specialized hardware built for this exact job. Result under 5.96 kilojoules per proof. That means same proof, but around 23% less power. Now, why does that matter to you? Because the proof is the invisible bill behind the apps you use. You fill it in fees, speed and how hard crypto is to scale. Lower cost, same trust. And this was step 1. What is in step 2? Check if it can handle the volume of the whole network. And while we're waiting for the next step from Sysik, proof got 23% cheaper. What's the one out-

Contributing Voices for $PUMP

@BillboardCTO