$NOMISMA
Cooling DownSnapshot Window: 2026-07-07 03:10 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 49, Retweets: 1, Likes: 48, Impressions: 219
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 3 source posts analyzed
三星财报超预期，存储却跌了； 微策略明确卖币，币价却涨了； 短线真的很难，几乎不会有人通过炒短线发财
"Did we actually win the block size war — or did we lose?" @Excellion asks the question most Bitcoiners won't. Fees as a filter, the jump to 4MB, and why @LukeDashjr may have been right about smaller blocks. The context the BIP 110 fight skips. Samson Mow on whether we [Spoken audio]: Another aspect of it is really the core people are saying the fees are the filter. And I think that misses another important point, which is you're not looking at the entire network and what has happened. So it's true that fees do filter spam because you, Cedric, as a Bitcoin transacting user of the network, you're paying fees to send your transactions, right? And a spammer also pays fees. But what we did during the block size war is we changed that whole dynamic. We changed the unit economics because we increased the block size and decreased fee pressure. So we kind of made it cheaper to spam the network too. And what's interesting for me is that only one person had talked about decreasing the block size back then, and that was Luke. And I think he was right. So it begs the question of, did we actually win the block size war or did we lose? because we did have a net increase in the effective block space going to four megabytes. And the repercussions of that, I don't think we've really analyzed or reasoned out, but I think maybe it was a mistake to go to four. Maybe we should have kept it at one and left the settings of the network as they were, but...
New Pair: KOL casino616 just bought $1.2K of $SAPIJIJU at $933.52K MC