$BASE
Cooling DownSnapshot Window: 2026-07-06 11:30 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 5, Retweets: 2, Likes: 13, Impressions: 1527
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 2 source posts analyzed
Proving quantum security before a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists comes down to mathematics, not hardware, @YuviLightman , CEO and Co-Founder at @QuantusNetwork , explained. Mathematical models for how a quantum computer will behave have existed for decades, [Spoken audio]: So go ahead. Do you want to explain this new system? And what are most people misunderstand about this system? Well, I think, you know, the first, the most common question we get is, is how do you know your system is quantum secure if you don't have a quantum computer? Right. And this is a good question. It's very natural. You know, I think it's good for people to be skeptical, but it's sort of a confusion of layers. This is a, it's actually a math problem, not a sort of a computer network engineering problem, so you wouldn't hire a red team to go break the algorithm. You'd hire some mathematicians. And so this is at a certain level of academia in advanced computer science or mathematics, the idea of analyzing an algorithm against a quantum attacker has existed for quite a while. And the way it works is we have mathematical models for how a quantum computer will work and we've had that for decades before we had the hardware and so that's why we started building the hardware is because we realized we could do this thing if we gain sufficient control over reality. Do we have the hardware yet and if we don't like how close are we to it because I keep look this is obviously something that's been super interesting to me not just for like the last year, but maybe for the last decade, if not even more than that.
Holy crap, just thought of something: If last night @TCryptochicks had directly given CZ 50% of $TCC That would’ve been the perfect closed loop.