$INAYERHWEB3
Sudden SpikeSnapshot Window: 2026-07-05 05:00 UTC · ← Back to Crypto Overview
Social Momentum Summary
Total Engagement - Comments: 37, Retweets: 0, Likes: 34, Impressions: 146
Verbatim Community Citations & Social Evidence 1 source posts analyzed
Proph3t clarifies that MetaDAO's model prioritizes eliminating rug pulls over restricting founders, noting he is a founder who wants them to succeed while fixing token discounts from rug fears seen in projects like Pump Fun. @MetaDAOProject uses futarchy via decision markets on [Spoken audio]: I guess the final thing I would say is just like recently I've been meeting a lot of liquid funds to to explain our model better to them and there's like a few common misconceptions I find and that's why it's good to have these meetings so I can dispel them and one is yeah that we are like governance maxis or like anti-team or something we are not uh we I mean I myself am a founder Right? Like I want founders to win. We are purely trying to solve this problem of rugs, which are a massive problem in crypto. And if you're working crypto today, you are affected by them. Either you've been rugged, or if you work in a project, it's maybe getting discounted. Like it's so convenient it's getting discounted because investors think that there's some probability that are rugs, right? Like pump fund is an example of this, where it trades that probably discount because people know the buybacks can turn off at any point. And yeah, so like that is our goal. It's not community governance. And if you have any ideas of how we can solve that problem in a governance minimized way, like we're all we're all yours to that.
