# $OSMO Catalyst Posts & Social Intelligence Recap — April 14, 2026 > **Asset:** $OSMO > **Date:** 2026-04-14 (April 14, 2026) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/tokens/osmo/2026-04-14 > **Token Profile:** https://cryptitalk.com/tokens/osmo.md > **Market Rankings:** https://cryptitalk.com/rankings.md --- ## Curated Viral Posts & Community Evidence ### Post #1 by @Cryptocito > **Author:** Cito ([@Cryptocito](https://x.com/Cryptocito)) > **Metrics:** 102 likes · 20 retweets · 37 comments · 9.2K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T06:59:56+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Cryptocito/status/2043947343968379146](https://x.com/Cryptocito/status/2043947343968379146) > > ""It Gets ATOM the Much Needed Revenue Source." Osmosis' co-founder shared with me on why his proposed ATOM ⬌ OSMO merger is a win-win for the ecosystem. Two of the most important protocols in Cosmos are potentially becoming one. The proposal is live on both networks with 2" ### Post #2 by @tonyler_ > **Author:** tøny ([@tonyler_](https://x.com/tonyler_)) > **Metrics:** 104 likes · 24 retweets · 22 comments · 8.6K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T10:29:00+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/tonyler_/status/2043999958831931714](https://x.com/tonyler_/status/2043999958831931714) > > "We all want @osmosis to merge with the Hub for real revenue. But voting NO is just rejecting bad terms, especially when Osmosis and @cosmoslabs_io lack alignment. Every time a Cosmos community rushed into massive controversial decisions, we ended up getting rekt." ### Post #3 by @JohnnyWyles87 > **Author:** JohnnyWyles ([@JohnnyWyles87](https://x.com/JohnnyWyles87)) > **Metrics:** 71 likes · 14 retweets · 6 comments · 8.4K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T10:42:41+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/JohnnyWyles87/status/2044003402057744473](https://x.com/JohnnyWyles87/status/2044003402057744473) > > "Osmosis has voted to migrate. Now the decision sits with the Cosmos Hub. With ~2 days left and a close vote, participation matters. If you stake ATOM, take a moment to review Proposal 1029 and cast your vote." ### Post #4 by @Airdrops_one > **Author:** Grey Ledger ([@Airdrops_one](https://x.com/Airdrops_one)) > **Metrics:** 22 likes · 1 retweets · 4 comments · 5.2K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T15:33:42+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Airdrops_one/status/2044076640464941512](https://x.com/Airdrops_one/status/2044076640464941512) > > ""we will not budge" is a seller's posture. are there competing offers for @osmosis ? if the @cosmoshub is the only bid, the community pool is the entire market for this deal. that changes what "reasonable" means. vote with your $ATOM" ### Post #5 by @GibCryptoNews > **Author:** Crypto Warehouse ([@GibCryptoNews](https://x.com/GibCryptoNews)) > **Metrics:** 10 likes · 8 retweets · 1 comments · 3.6K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T11:29:29+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/GibCryptoNews/status/2044015181655638344](https://x.com/GibCryptoNews/status/2044015181655638344) > > "Really, really solid RWA list here from Emperor. Cannot really fault any of his rankings. Mine differ but that is what life is all about. Great work @Flowslikeosmo ." ### Post #6 by @Airdrops_one > **Author:** Grey Ledger ([@Airdrops_one](https://x.com/Airdrops_one)) > **Metrics:** 31 likes · 4 retweets · 4 comments · 3.2K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T21:29:10+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Airdrops_one/status/2044166096161517893](https://x.com/Airdrops_one/status/2044166096161517893) > > "Barry & Cosmos Labs on Cosmosis: tl;dr: Right direction. Wrong deal. @cosmoslabs_io is not rejecting the idea of a Hub DEX, but they are rejecting paying this much, in this structure, for @osmosis specifically. Osmosis proposal is too expensive, too loose on incentives, and" ### Post #7 by @MoonixLoL > **Author:** MooNix ([@MoonixLoL](https://x.com/MoonixLoL)) > **Metrics:** 22 likes · 1 retweets · 11 comments · 3.0K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T21:37:40+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/MoonixLoL/status/2044168233758904357](https://x.com/MoonixLoL/status/2044168233758904357) > > "$ATOM $OSMO Classic. Cosmos founders. Cash out - Peace out - or come back to try to collect one more before riding the night. Hopefully Greg will be better one of the last cosmos founders that (not yet) left his baby and cba‘d Fitting he leaves cosmos with $AKT" ### Post #8 by @joe4deadcat > **Author:** Joe 2.0 ([@joe4deadcat](https://x.com/joe4deadcat)) > **Metrics:** 14 likes · 2 retweets · 5 comments · 3.0K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T13:09:28+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/joe4deadcat/status/2044040341825732963](https://x.com/joe4deadcat/status/2044040341825732963) > > "Re: Pending Crypto Merger The @osmosis community is demanding 2.5% of the $ATOM supply im exchange for the Osmosis DEX. Is this a reasonable price?" ### Post #9 by @joe4deadcat > **Author:** Joe 2.0 ([@joe4deadcat](https://x.com/joe4deadcat)) > **Metrics:** 17 likes · 0 retweets · 4 comments · 2.6K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T20:22:50+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/joe4deadcat/status/2044149402672022012](https://x.com/joe4deadcat/status/2044149402672022012) > > "The @cosmoshub SHOULD NOT consider any deal for @osmosis unless they have a plan to SCALE it massively. Who in Cosmos has the ability to do this? $ATOM $OSMO" ### Post #10 by @orionas_cosmos > **Author:** Oriøn ([@orionas_cosmos](https://x.com/orionas_cosmos)) > **Metrics:** 16 likes · 0 retweets · 5 comments · 2.0K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T20:22:00+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/orionas_cosmos/status/2044149193611034992](https://x.com/orionas_cosmos/status/2044149193611034992) > > "I can’t understand why @sunnya97 you don’t work more on the terms of the merging prop so all the OSMO holders could benefit from? Not a merging expert but I am in huge loss atm for supporting the zeroing of my biggest investment I stake OSMO at any price since 2022" ### Post #11 by @paplianos > **Author:** Paplianos ([@paplianos](https://x.com/paplianos)) > **Metrics:** 29 likes · 4 retweets · 5 comments · 1.7K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T10:34:33+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/paplianos/status/2044001356957016539](https://x.com/paplianos/status/2044001356957016539) > > "While the idea of merging Osmosis into the Hub sounds great in theory the current terms are simply not good enough. Voting NO is the smartest move right now. It forces better alignment and protects the community from another rushed decision we’ll regret later." ### Post #12 by @AgentKwosh > **Author:** Agent.Kwosh ([@AgentKwosh](https://x.com/AgentKwosh)) > **Metrics:** 34 likes · 1 retweets · 10 comments · 1.5K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T08:04:52+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/AgentKwosh/status/2043963685593354550](https://x.com/AgentKwosh/status/2043963685593354550) > > "$Osmo airdrop to $atom HOLDERS was WAY bigger than osmo asking price to merge. Dont be bitches. Vote yes on prop 1029!" ### Post #13 by @ToschDev > **Author:** Tosch ([@ToschDev](https://x.com/ToschDev)) > **Metrics:** 19 likes · 2 retweets · 1 comments · 1.3K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T19:46:06+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ToschDev/status/2044140156525875520](https://x.com/ToschDev/status/2044140156525875520) > > "After the #Osmosis merger failed, we're back to doing nothing I guess. #Cosmos #CosmosHub" ### Post #14 by @LesCosmonautes > **Author:** Cosmonautes ([@LesCosmonautes](https://x.com/LesCosmonautes)) > **Metrics:** 10 likes · 0 retweets · 2 comments · 1.2K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T17:12:31+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/LesCosmonautes/status/2044101505314160833](https://x.com/LesCosmonautes/status/2044101505314160833) > > "Osmosis is still and always the only IBC-based DEX. With IBC Eureka, this is changing, and Uniswap, Aerodrome, and Jupiter are becoming — and will become increasingly — natively interchain. Hyperliquid could also be one, if its interoperability standard wasn’t a 3/4 multisig." ### Post #15 by @Quasarstaking > **Author:** Quasar Validator ([@Quasarstaking](https://x.com/Quasarstaking)) > **Metrics:** 17 likes · 2 retweets · 4 comments · 1.0K views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T15:39:18+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Quasarstaking/status/2044078049990201571](https://x.com/Quasarstaking/status/2044078049990201571) > > "We vote “NO” the Osmosis Proposal and here is why 1. The asked amount is huge and it will drain the CP 2. ICL is not planning to develop and run the Osmosis DEX - so money will be spend for nothing 3. Osmosis has a great product but in the current state it is not able to" ### Post #16 by @osmosupply > **Author:** Osmo ([@osmosupply](https://x.com/osmosupply)) > **Metrics:** 21 likes · 2 retweets · 0 comments · 875 views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T09:37:10+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/osmosupply/status/2043986912398946464](https://x.com/osmosupply/status/2043986912398946464) > > "Today featured in the Osmo Showcase: Champions For Good, using 3 Osmo Resources. Created by Jakob Wiemer, Samuel Siebler, Eduard Bodak, Pol O’Callaghan & Paul Adolphs. Resources: 1. Swiper Slider Setup 2. Flick Cards Slider 3. Stacked Cards Slider champions4good.club" ### Post #17 by @AsankaKasum > **Author:** Asa332 ([@AsankaKasum](https://x.com/AsankaKasum)) > **Metrics:** 11 likes · 2 retweets · 7 comments · 561 views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T03:56:17+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/AsankaKasum/status/2043901128170196993](https://x.com/AsankaKasum/status/2043901128170196993) > > "If you have a different opinion than your validator on Cosmos Hub proposal #1029 - “Acquisition and Merger of Osmosis into the Cosmos Hub” , you can override your validator’s vote with your own. @cosmoshub @osmosis mintscan.io/cosmos/proposa … wallet.keplr.app/chains/cosmos- …" ### Post #18 by @ekudo042 > **Author:** Ekudo Research ([@ekudo042](https://x.com/ekudo042)) > **Metrics:** 11 likes · 0 retweets · 3 comments · 552 views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T18:10:04+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ekudo042/status/2044115990427119994](https://x.com/ekudo042/status/2044115990427119994) > > "There is no longer any chance for Proposal 1029 Faced with crucial proposals for our ecosystem, we see the lack of harmony within the hub Osmosis should also face the current reality in order to make more appropriate adjustments. The merger of Osmosis into Cosmos is good, but" ### Post #19 by @The5thForce0_0 > **Author:** The5thForce ([@The5thForce0_0](https://x.com/The5thForce0_0)) > **Metrics:** 7 likes · 2 retweets · 2 comments · 187 views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T04:08:16+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/The5thForce0_0/status/2043904143266648545](https://x.com/The5thForce0_0/status/2043904143266648545) > > "Took me a while to sit down and watch this because I was travelling but absolutely a worthwhile watch. @sunnya97 has always been one of the most forward-thinking gigabrains in Cosmos, and @Cryptocito does a fantastic job digging out the details of the Osmosis merge." ### Post #20 by @Flowslikeosmo > **Author:** Emperor Osmo ([@Flowslikeosmo](https://x.com/Flowslikeosmo)) > **Metrics:** 10 likes · 3 retweets · 3 comments · 151 views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T00:45:02+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Flowslikeosmo/status/2043852997633917050](https://x.com/Flowslikeosmo/status/2043852997633917050) > > "I get my alpha from Sibyl." ### Post #21 by @sunnya97 > **Author:** Sunny Aggarwal ([@sunnya97](https://x.com/sunnya97)) > **Metrics:** 4 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 135 views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T03:13:09+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/sunnya97/status/2043890271675457696](https://x.com/sunnya97/status/2043890271675457696) > > "The Chain AUM of @Osmosis is $100M! Osmosis is a trusted platform for users." ### Post #22 by @Airdrops_one > **Author:** Grey Ledger ([@Airdrops_one](https://x.com/Airdrops_one)) > **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 98 views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T01:21:39+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Airdrops_one/status/2043862213547507821](https://x.com/Airdrops_one/status/2043862213547507821) > > "Tony, what's up with not buying $OSMO anymore?" ### Post #23 by @Flowslikeosmo > **Author:** Emperor Osmo ([@Flowslikeosmo](https://x.com/Flowslikeosmo)) > **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 78 views > **Posted:** 2026-04-14T15:34:26+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Flowslikeosmo/status/2044076825635062129](https://x.com/Flowslikeosmo/status/2044076825635062129) > > "Good alpha, been adding over the past few days." --- *Generated by Context Pilot Social Intelligence Engine.*