# $ONT Catalyst Posts & Social Intelligence Recap — June 11, 2026 > **Asset:** $ONT > **Date:** 2026-06-11 (June 11, 2026) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/tokens/ont/2026-06-11 > **Token Profile:** https://cryptitalk.com/tokens/ont.md > **Market Rankings:** https://cryptitalk.com/rankings.md --- ## Curated Viral Posts & Community Evidence ### Post #1 by @OntologyNetwork > **Author:** Ontology - The Trust Layer for Web3 ([@OntologyNetwork](https://x.com/OntologyNetwork)) > **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 17 views > **Posted:** 2026-06-11T09:08:44+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/OntologyNetwork/status/2064998255549669763](https://x.com/OntologyNetwork/status/2064998255549669763) > > "1: Can you name who made each judgement? A spreadsheet of vendor usernames is a no. A stable evaluator identity the evaluator controls, surviving vendor switches and churn, is a yes. Permanently." ### Post #2 by @ONTOWallet > **Author:** ONTO Wallet - Web3 Gateway ([@ONTOWallet](https://x.com/ONTOWallet)) > **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 11 views > **Posted:** 2026-06-11T09:31:43+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ONTOWallet/status/2065004037078921272](https://x.com/ONTOWallet/status/2065004037078921272) > **Visual Note:** The image shows a post with a blue background, white text, and a hexagon shape. The title of the post reads "Can you name who made each judgement?" and there are two questions below it that ask if the user can name the creator or developer of an identity. The answer to these questions is "yes". > > "Question 1 on today's checklist is the one everything else hangs off: can you name who made each judgement? ONT ID anchors the identity. ONTO Wallet carries the credentials. Questions 2 to 5 follow." ### Post #3 by @OntologyNetwork > **Author:** Ontology - The Trust Layer for Web3 ([@OntologyNetwork](https://x.com/OntologyNetwork)) > **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 9 views > **Posted:** 2026-06-11T09:08:45+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/OntologyNetwork/status/2064998257680404739](https://x.com/OntologyNetwork/status/2064998257680404739) > **Visual Note:** The image shows a screenshot of a document titled "2: Does each judgment carry its rubric? Version, timestamp, issuer, signed in. Without them, a step-level preference judgement is an opinion. With them, it is evidence your red team can reconstruct batch by batch." The text on the screen provides information about how to use the document and what it contains. > > "2: Does each judgement carry its rubric? Version, timestamp, issuer, signed in. Without them, a step-level preference judgement is an opinion. With them, it is evidence your red team can reconstruct batch by batch." ### Post #4 by @sveta_chmo > **Author:** Crypto Jake ([@sveta_chmo](https://x.com/sveta_chmo)) > **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 7 views > **Posted:** 2026-06-11T15:38:59+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/sveta_chmo/status/2065096462711566344](https://x.com/sveta_chmo/status/2065096462711566344) > **Visual Note:** The image shows a white background with text that includes several numbers such as "81,000.00USD", "91,091.11%", "57.41", "43.86", "92.51", "59,871.71", and "32,876". These numbers appear to be related to a cryptocurrency trading activity or an account balance in general. The image also contains symbols such as "$ont" which might indicate the currency used for transactions within the crypto market. The overall layout of the image suggests a discussion about financial topics surrounding cryptocurrency trading. > > "#Crypto The market never sleeps — and neither does the opportunity. I’m a futures trader dropping my personal high-probability setups with exact entries and exits for free. t.me/+iRhU3aoXli0wM … $ONT $AVL 4n5t2d" --- *Generated by Context Pilot Social Intelligence Engine.*