# $LIQUID Catalyst Posts & Social Intelligence Recap — September 06, 2026 > **Asset:** $LIQUID > **Date:** 2026-09-06 (September 06, 2026) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/tokens/liquid/2026-09-06 > **Token Profile:** https://cryptitalk.com/tokens/liquid.md > **Market Rankings:** https://cryptitalk.com/rankings.md --- ## Curated Viral Posts & Community Evidence ### Post #1 by @Cyphertux > **Author:** Cyphertux ∅ ([@Cyphertux](https://x.com/Cyphertux)) > **Metrics:** 96 likes · 33 retweets · 9 comments · 24.3K views > **Posted:** 2026-09-06T20:37:12+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Cyphertux/status/2096699256627220673](https://x.com/Cyphertux/status/2096699256627220673) > **Visual Note:** A tooltip displays "Please contact security@blockstream.com" over a Bitcoin transaction showing a 0.00001387 BTC transfer to address bc1qn8m...9q2mfqym, dated 2026-09-06 21:31:47 with 7 confirmations. The image illustrates that even Liquid's federated sidechain, which relies on a 15-functionary quorum, can have its multisig security compromised through social engineering, as evidenced by this on-chain message pleading for contact with Blockstream security. > > "I'm adding an element to my previous post, because the technical context makes this story even crazier. Liquid isn't supposed to work like a classic wallet that a single person can drain. The network currently relies on 15 functionaries, with a quorum of 11/15 to secure the" ### Post #2 by @btcinsider__ > **Author:** bitcoin++ Insider Edition ([@btcinsider__](https://x.com/btcinsider__)) > **Metrics:** 67 likes · 26 retweets · 3 comments · 12.5K views > **Posted:** 2026-09-06T19:52:39+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/btcinsider__/status/2096688045235822986](https://x.com/btcinsider__/status/2096688045235822986) > **Visual Note:** The image displays a blockchain transaction with 6 confidential inputs that successfully executed a peg-out of 3,996.01834922 LBTC from a Liquid exchange address (ex1qsgOxx2plutvahv8atmd6qxxua6utjxm414khey), with transaction fees of 0.00000177 LBTC. This visually confirms the context's claim about hackers exploiting a vulnerability in the HSM signing function to authorize a fraudulent ~3,998 BTC peg-out using a valid 6-input confidential transaction structure. > > "It appears that the hackers created a valid 6-input confidential @Liquid_BTC transaction that registered as a valid 3,998 bitcoin peg-out transaction, which the HSM functionaries then signed as a valid move of bitcoin onto the chain. The hackers have stated they are whitehats" ### Post #3 by @darosior > **Author:** Antoine Poinsot ([@darosior](https://x.com/darosior)) > **Metrics:** 15 likes · 4 retweets · 1 comments · 5.7K views > **Posted:** 2026-09-06T20:16:59+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/darosior/status/2096694170886779239](https://x.com/darosior/status/2096694170886779239) > > "The pegout tx on the Liquid side is ce4caece413cd9d444ce7ed9f54e5b328b3da5e4af301aff59a3571f76e988f2 It notably spends a 63 inputs tx made a few minutes prior: c652a1047ff549698b09242a66e20f6e9a044d5c972419342fa552b0856ba674" ### Post #4 by @Truthcoin > **Author:** Paul Sztorc ([@Truthcoin](https://x.com/Truthcoin)) > **Metrics:** 16 likes · 1 retweets · 2 comments · 1.1K views > **Posted:** 2026-09-06T20:59:01+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Truthcoin/status/2096704747885691034](https://x.com/Truthcoin/status/2096704747885691034) > > "Some posts about Liquid" ### Post #5 by @blckchaindaily > **Author:** Blockchain Daily News ([@blckchaindaily](https://x.com/blckchaindaily)) > **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 269 views > **Posted:** 2026-09-06T21:37:28+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/blckchaindaily/status/2096714426468491404](https://x.com/blckchaindaily/status/2096714426468491404) > > "🚨 LIQUID EXPLOIT: DEVS THEORIZE VULNERABILITY IS IN CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTIONS, NODE-LEVEL ISSUE UNRELATED TO PAKS OR HSMS; UNCONFIRMED" ### Post #6 by @_johan_43 > **Author:** 𝗝𝗢𝗛𝗔𝗡 ([@_johan_43](https://x.com/_johan_43)) > **Metrics:** 11 likes · 0 retweets · 7 comments · 103 views > **Posted:** 2026-09-06T04:39:23+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/_johan_43/status/2096458215156494836](https://x.com/_johan_43/status/2096458215156494836) > **Visual Note:** A trading card from Liquid showing a Bitcoin (PERP) 35x SHORT position with a current return of -10.60%, entry at $79,509.70, mark at $79,764.50, shared by @BSPOT6272 at liquid.trade/r/V9EHRINZ. > > "Definitely not a good morning But anyways we keep moving.... gLiquid.... Today I will post something very interesting about liquid. Tight your horses 😌 @liquidtrading" ### Post #7 by @BenJustman > **Author:** Ben Justman🍷 ([@BenJustman](https://x.com/BenJustman)) > **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 55 views > **Posted:** 2026-09-06T23:32:21+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/BenJustman/status/2096743334148469107](https://x.com/BenJustman/status/2096743334148469107) > **Visual Note:** A woman peeks over the top of a bathroom stall door, looking down at a framed wall poster that displays various drug awareness flyers. > > "Wait liquid was a shitcoin??" ### Post #8 by @vikrantnyc > **Author:** Vik Sharɱa - Cake Wallet & Radar Chat 🇺🇸 📡 ([@vikrantnyc](https://x.com/vikrantnyc)) > **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments > **Posted:** 2026-09-06T19:59:25+00:00 > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/vikrantnyc/status/2096689750077771797](https://x.com/vikrantnyc/status/2096689750077771797) > **Visual Note:** A cryptocurrency transaction confirmation screen showing Bitcoin transactions with addresses beginning with 'bc1q', displaying amounts of 3,995.999999857 BTC and 2.4974985 BTC, with 'OP_RETURN' data showing the message 'we are whitesheets. contact us on chain' and 'realbaldfamtvms4uuzp424ze...xsuhexxxxr', dated 2026-09-06. > > "Get your coins off of Liquid Network people. Or at least be cautious." --- *Generated by Context Pilot Social Intelligence Engine.*