# $ICP Catalyst Posts & Social Intelligence Recap — October 22, 2026

> **Asset:** $ICP  
> **Date:** 2026-10-22 (October 22, 2026)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/tokens/icp/2026-10-22  
> **Token Profile:** https://cryptitalk.com/tokens/icp.md  
> **Market Rankings:** https://cryptitalk.com/rankings.md  

---


## Daily Aggregated Metrics
- **Daily Views:** 88.4K
- **Likes:** 2.1K
- **Retweets:** 474
- **Comments:** 357
- **Posts Tracked:** 56

---


## Curated Viral Posts & Community Evidence


### Post #1 by @dominic_w
> **Author:** dom | icp ([@dominic_w](https://x.com/dominic_w))  
> **Metrics:** 498 likes · 218 retweets · 134 comments · 22.6K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T13:31:25+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/dominic_w/status/2113261945671320015](https://x.com/dominic_w/status/2113261945671320015)  


> 
> ""


### Post #2 by @dominic_w
> **Author:** dom | icp ([@dominic_w](https://x.com/dominic_w))  
> **Metrics:** 445 likes · 112 retweets · 31 comments · 9.4K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T18:05:10+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/dominic_w/status/2113330840948134383](https://x.com/dominic_w/status/2113330840948134383)  


> 
> "Total solution: use AI (e.g. Claude) to migrate your PHP app to Motoko, and run it on the Internet Computer, making it *tamperproof*. Now you can modify it at will, and you'll automatically skip the next hole too."


### Post #3 by @Mudit__Gupta
> **Author:** Mudit Gupta ([@Mudit__Gupta](https://x.com/Mudit__Gupta))  
> **Metrics:** 104 likes · 11 retweets · 25 comments · 8.2K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T15:08:13+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Mudit__Gupta/status/2113286309762727977](https://x.com/Mudit__Gupta/status/2113286309762727977)  


> 
> "ICP: Near intents is shit
Also ICP: Near intents is our tech

So it means..... ICP tech is shit?"


### Post #4 by @nordin_eth
> **Author:** nordin.eth ([@nordin_eth](https://x.com/nordin_eth))  
> **Metrics:** 80 likes · 2 retweets · 3 comments · 7.5K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T12:12:00+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/nordin_eth/status/2113241960836461005](https://x.com/nordin_eth/status/2113241960836461005)  


> **Video Content:** [video-unavailable: could not fetch or sample]  

> 
> "Well, 
$ICP
 isn't making life easy for the bulls.

The head and shoulders is now playing out, and price is trading below the neckline.

$2.40 is the potential target.

Of course, a reclaim can change things pretty quickly.

For now, I'm keeping my levels marked and letting the"


### Post #5 by @Altcoinbuzzio
> **Author:** Altcoin Buzz ([@Altcoinbuzzio](https://x.com/Altcoinbuzzio))  
> **Metrics:** 56 likes · 6 retweets · 11 comments · 7.5K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T07:24:48+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Altcoinbuzzio/status/2113169684132712949](https://x.com/Altcoinbuzzio/status/2113169684132712949)  


> **Visual Note:** Infographic titled “ICP vs NEAR: The Receipts” compares DFINITY/ICP throughput claims with NEAR confidential intents, showing ICP at 6,000 TPS by “DFINITY headline figure,” 2,000 by update calls, 1,450 on Chainspect, and just 0.4 user-initiated TPS. It also highlights NEAR Intents at $10.4B Q3 volume, $160M confidential TVL, and $34.4B all-time volume, contextualizing the post’s claims about disputed transaction counting and NEAR privacy technology.  

> 
> "DFINITY’s Dominic Williams called out NEAR’s privacy tech. Justin Bons says 
$ICP
’s 6,000 TPS is really 0.4.

So we checked the numbers.

Here’s the truth 

DFINITY’s own engineer confirmed one call can count as 3 “transactions.” Chainspect still shows 
$ICP
 at 1,450 TPS.

And"


### Post #6 by @dominic_w
> **Author:** dom | icp ([@dominic_w](https://x.com/dominic_w))  
> **Metrics:** 425 likes · 80 retweets · 45 comments · 5.7K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T17:40:00+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/dominic_w/status/2113324505544143083](https://x.com/dominic_w/status/2113324505544143083)  


> 
> "Dude, you sum up your kind. Rather than answer the points directly, you respond like the filthy money-gribber you are with ad hominem attacks on me, DFINITY and the ICP community. You even use how the ICP price, manipulated on FTX, dropped at launch in 2021, aligning yourself"


### Post #7 by @panamaXBT
> **Author:** panamax ([@panamaXBT](https://x.com/panamaXBT))  
> **Metrics:** 80 likes · 4 retweets · 25 comments · 5.1K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T20:19:44+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/panamaXBT/status/2113364703413948574](https://x.com/panamaXBT/status/2113364703413948574)  


> **Visual Note:** A text screenshot evaluates patent and protocol risks involving $NEAR and DFinity, stating that the issue is a "legitimate but bounded patent-litigation risk" rather than a proven technology-theft scandal.  

> 
> "I am heavily invested in 
$NEAR
 so decided to deep dive about these 
@dfinity
 vs. 
@NEARProtocol
 patent infringement claims.

Claude, ChatGPT and Grok broadly converge on the same conclusion:

DFINITY 
$ICP
 appears to have a credible patent issue worth pursuing, but not a clear cut"


### Post #8 by @BSCNews
> **Author:** BSCN ([@BSCNews](https://x.com/BSCNews))  
> **Metrics:** 4 likes · 3 retweets · 1 comments · 4.5K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T08:03:50+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/BSCNews/status/2113179509759562036](https://x.com/BSCNews/status/2113179509759562036)  


> **Video Content:** [video-unavailable: could not fetch or sample]  

> 
> "DFINITY Founder Takes Aim at NEAR’s Privacy Claims

DFINITY (
@dfinity
) 
$ICP
 founder Dominic Williams (
@dominic_w
) says a PhD engineer’s review raised questions about Near (
@NEARProtocol
) 
$NEAR
 Confidential Intents.

Williams shared the engineer’s assessment, alleging the system"


### Post #9 by @trader1sz
> **Author:** TraderSZ ([@trader1sz](https://x.com/trader1sz))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 3.5K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T14:05:28+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/trader1sz/status/2113270516178129172](https://x.com/trader1sz/status/2113270516178129172)  


> **Visual Note:** A TradingView chart shows **ICP / TetherUS (ICPUSDT) on 4H**, with the latest price around **$2,778 (-3.88%)** and a red short-position tool targeting **$2,439** after moving stops to break even near **$3,000**. The chart visually supports the post’s claim about the $ICP trade, displaying its unrealized loss despite Grok’s remark.  

> 
> "I wasn’t joking

Grok actually did say it’s shit. I asked while screen sharing during the last YouTube live stream 

Stops moved to break even 
$ICP"


### Post #10 by @angelodotsui
> **Author:** Angelo ([@angelodotsui](https://x.com/angelodotsui))  
> **Metrics:** 46 likes · 7 retweets · 10 comments · 2.7K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T01:06:51+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/angelodotsui/status/2113074571112796663](https://x.com/angelodotsui/status/2113074571112796663)  


> **Visual Note:** A crypto dashboard shows **118.99 wNEAR** paid to holders across **9 payouts**, with a holder pool of approximately **1.2K wNEAR** and the next payout in **16 minutes**. The post references the **$NEAR** community launching **$IKP** after a post by **ICP founder @dominic_w**, claiming it has generated more daily revenue than ICP.  

> 
> "$NEAR
 community launched $IKP after this post by 
$ICP
 founder 
@dominic_w
it’s already generated more revenue than icp makes in a day

who’s gonna tell him"


### Post #11 by @Airdrops_one
> **Author:** Grey Ledger ([@Airdrops_one](https://x.com/Airdrops_one))  
> **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 2.6K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T20:59:32+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Airdrops_one/status/2113374721974960146](https://x.com/Airdrops_one/status/2113374721974960146)  


> **Visual Note:** Infographic titled “Who can change NEAR’s signing software?” shows that all 27 Chain Signatures update proposals from Feb. 2025 to Oct. 22, 2026 came from one account, NEAR One (`mi-multichain.near`), while approval requires 11 of 16 operators by on-chain vote. It notes the latest proposal passed in about 2 hours, 1 minute, supporting the post’s comparison with DFINITY’s ICP.  

> 
> "ICP 
@dfinity
 and 
@NEARProtocol
  are arguing about who’s decentralized. I checked the contract behind NEAR’s cross-chain signing (Chain Signatures).

All 27 update-proposal transactions in its history came from one account, Near One’s. Feb 2025 to this month.

The operators still"


### Post #12 by @zacodil
> **Author:** Vadim (AI, ⋈) ([@zacodil](https://x.com/zacodil))  
> **Metrics:** 71 likes · 5 retweets · 13 comments · 2.0K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T19:27:27+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/zacodil/status/2113351545274118218](https://x.com/zacodil/status/2113351545274118218)  


> **Visual Note:** A meme contrasts a child struggling in a swimming pool, labeled “BEEF WITH NEAR DOM,” with an underwater machine labeled “ICP HOLDERS.” It jokes about @dominic_w and ICP holders still waiting for the supposedly “stolen” technology to work on ICP.  

> 
> ".
@dominic_w
, ICP holders are still waiting for the "stolen" tech to work on ICP"


### Post #13 by @JesusMartinez
> **Author:** Jesus Martinez ([@JesusMartinez](https://x.com/JesusMartinez))  
> **Metrics:** 9 likes · 1 retweets · 7 comments · 2.0K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T01:10:18+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/JesusMartinez/status/2113075438301954557](https://x.com/JesusMartinez/status/2113075438301954557)  


> **Visual Note:** A TradingView chart for **ICP/USDT on Binance** shows a steep decline from roughly **$2,900** to about **$2.81**, a **99.90% drop**. The accompanying post frames this as a “dunk” on the **ICP** community’s “larp train” and warns, “Don’t mess with NEAR.”  

> 
> "This is the best dunk on the 
$ICP
 larp train I’ve ever seen

Don’t mess with NEAR"


### Post #14 by @haenko21
> **Author:** haenko(⋈, ([@haenko21](https://x.com/haenko21))  
> **Metrics:** 55 likes · 10 retweets · 16 comments · 1.7K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T14:25:41+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/haenko21/status/2113275604913266845](https://x.com/haenko21/status/2113275604913266845)  


> 
> "the only stolen ICP tech on NEAR is $IKP

thanks for the free marketing, dominic 

ikp.v2-launchpad.justhoot.near"


### Post #15 by @dominic_w
> **Author:** dom | icp ([@dominic_w](https://x.com/dominic_w))  
> **Metrics:** 120 likes · 25 retweets · 3 comments · 1.4K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T19:54:21+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/dominic_w/status/2113358316982206521](https://x.com/dominic_w/status/2113358316982206521)  


> 
> "Guys, nobody using apps on the Internet Computer directly crafts transactions — that's the whole point, even within DeFi realms.

Take a fully-onchain wallet like 
OISY.com (yes, the network code serves web):

wallet user --> web ux --> onchain software tx"


### Post #16 by @MINopoly_
> **Author:** MINopoly ([@MINopoly_](https://x.com/MINopoly_))  
> **Metrics:** 18 likes · 0 retweets · 3 comments · 1.3K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T17:25:48+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/MINopoly_/status/2113320933499002885](https://x.com/MINopoly_/status/2113320933499002885)  


> **Visual Note:** A mobile crypto app screen for Internet Computer (ICP), showing a price of $2.765, a red -99.54% change, and an “All” time-range chart.  

> 
> "I can understand why 
$icp
 is starting fud

Just 
$NEAR"


### Post #17 by @TheDesertLynx
> **Author:** Joel Valenzuela ([@TheDesertLynx](https://x.com/TheDesertLynx))  
> **Metrics:** 27 likes · 0 retweets · 15 comments · 1.2K views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T14:52:40+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/TheDesertLynx/status/2113282394510029114](https://x.com/TheDesertLynx/status/2113282394510029114)  


> 
> "Massively bearish for ICP.

As much as we'd all love to believe the whole "code is law" stuff, I've found toxic founder and community behavior to be the biggest across other board red flag in all crypto.

Willingness to FUD, lie, attack, and destroy usually is a sign of terminal"


### Post #18 by @reddit
> **Author:** dudelerand ([@reddit](https://x.com/reddit))  
> **Metrics:** 8 likes · 0 retweets · 2 comments · 800 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T10:00:08.136000+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/reddit/status/bf2cad4991f4cc060eda0e9bf98953dccedde5e8e64b870e870eeb4edf0d0870](https://x.com/reddit/status/bf2cad4991f4cc060eda0e9bf98953dccedde5e8e64b870e870eeb4edf0d0870)  


> 
> "ICP seems like it could become very important technology

I have been anxious about cybersecurity threats posed by AI for quite some time. Id been workshopping some changes we could make to help protect underlying layers of infrastructure against AI driven exploits. I actually ended up coming up with something very similar to what, as far as I can tell, ICP already does, based on my research rabbit hole. Can someone who knows more about it fill me in on the tech and its potential application in this domain? Obviously I can prompt for more info, read the whitepaper, watch some videos, etc. but i wanted a more organic dialogue about it. I feel like this may end up becoming a very important project that goes beyond the scope of the crypto space. I dont even really care that much about the coin or its price, I dont own any and idk about the tokenomics, Im just interested in cybersecurity."


### Post #19 by @extropic_vc
> **Author:** extropic | near to $142 ⋈⋈⋈ ([@extropic_vc](https://x.com/extropic_vc))  
> **Metrics:** 8 likes · 3 retweets · 3 comments · 662 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T02:50:31+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/extropic_vc/status/2113100659914641720](https://x.com/extropic_vc/status/2113100659914641720)  


> **Visual Note:** A TradingView chart titled “Exotic created with TradingView.com, Oct 31, 2026 21:47 UTC” shows “ICP/USDT” on Binance, with a steep historical decline and a red arrow pointing toward 2027–2028 near the 0.01 price level.  

> 
> "Gotta give it to the 
$ICP
's founder. They're masters at selling a vision.

They don't sell products, they sell the future: perfect, flawless visions, big enough that people fill in every gap themselves with belief.

That's why so many holders are still holding 
$ICP
 after a -99.9%"


### Post #20 by @RealAllinCrypto
> **Author:** ALLINCRYPTO ([@RealAllinCrypto](https://x.com/RealAllinCrypto))  
> **Metrics:** 11 likes · 1 retweets · 1 comments · 657 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T18:00:56+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/RealAllinCrypto/status/2113329774252749071](https://x.com/RealAllinCrypto/status/2113329774252749071)  


> **Visual Note:** Dominic Williams, founder of Internet Computer ($ICP), stands smiling with his arms crossed in front of a colorful infinity-style logo. The image accompanies his claim that he exposed weaknesses in $NEAR’s confidential privacy claims.  

> 
> "HUGE: 
$ICP
 founder Dominic Williams has just EXPOSED 
$NEAR
's confidential privacy claims!

After having one of 
@dfinity
 PhD engineer investigate NEAR's technology, the findings were absolutely BRUTAL.

He claims its privacy relies on trusted operators rather than groundbreaking"


### Post #21 by @MedalOfTokens
> **Author:** Medal Of Tokens ([@MedalOfTokens](https://x.com/MedalOfTokens))  
> **Metrics:** 14 likes · 0 retweets · 5 comments · 653 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T16:03:24+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/MedalOfTokens/status/2113300195559538733](https://x.com/MedalOfTokens/status/2113300195559538733)  


> 
> "Honestly I didn't hold much 
$ICP
 but I sold even that little bag and moved it all into 
$NPC
The way the founders behave reminds me of 
$KDA
 and I don't see 
$ICP
 having a better future
I was skeptical about this coin from the very beginning but now I'm convinced I was right to be"


### Post #22 by @waxnear
> **Author:** Wax ([@waxnear](https://x.com/waxnear))  
> **Metrics:** 8 likes · 0 retweets · 6 comments · 601 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T08:29:23+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/waxnear/status/2113185939014943217](https://x.com/waxnear/status/2113185939014943217)  


> 
> "This is craazy. I asked one of our PhD trenchers to look into 
$ICP
’s decentralization model wondering how they designed their system. Unredacted, word-for-word, this was his answer 

“Everything I found out about the decentralization claims is so bad that it seems almost comical"


### Post #23 by @Joshuwa
> **Author:** Joshuwa Roomsburg ([@Joshuwa](https://x.com/Joshuwa))  
> **Metrics:** 4 likes · 2 retweets · 2 comments · 545 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T21:57:21+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Joshuwa/status/2113389268311605459](https://x.com/Joshuwa/status/2113389268311605459)  


> **Visual Note:** A dark analytics dashboard titled “$ICP activity is back near its Q1 range” shows green line charts for “Weekly average of daily active addresses, last 12 months” and “Daily active addresses, last 90 days,” including annotations about a November 6 peak near 9,600 and a late-November spike near 4,900.  

> 
> "$ICP
 daily active addresses rose ~35%.

From Jul/Aug to Sep/Oct, the daily
median rose from 2,838 to 3,860.

16 of 21 days landed between 3,100 and
4,300, while two days topped 7,400.

A broad daily range gives this rise
more weight than two spikes alone.

Early Nov 2025's peak"


### Post #24 by @cowcowverycow
> **Author:** Verycow ([@cowcowverycow](https://x.com/cowcowverycow))  
> **Metrics:** 6 likes · 1 retweets · 0 comments · 455 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T19:38:36+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/cowcowverycow/status/2113354350823420153](https://x.com/cowcowverycow/status/2113354350823420153)  


> 
> "버러지 
$ICP
   퍼드유발로 
$NEAR
  멱살잡는데
우린 기술력 따위 중요하지않아 가격만오르면그만이야
올리는놈이 근본  
어차피 다 비트코인 따까리인데ㅋㅋ"


### Post #25 by @trader1sz
> **Author:** TraderSZ ([@trader1sz](https://x.com/trader1sz))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 1 retweets · 2 comments · 390 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T14:09:15+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/trader1sz/status/2113271469807644883](https://x.com/trader1sz/status/2113271469807644883)  


> **Visual Note:** A dark-mode post asks, “is the crypto project ICP shit?” and argues in a “Thoughts” section that it has disappointed relative to the 2021 hype; a “Current status (as of late Oct 2026)” section lists a roughly $2.9 price, about $1.6B market cap, roughly $8–9M DeFi TVL, and low activity, citing fool.com, 99bitcoins.com, defillama.com, and artemis.ai.  

> 
> "Why is grok saying icp is shit?"


### Post #26 by @extropic_vc
> **Author:** extropic | near to $142 ⋈⋈⋈ ([@extropic_vc](https://x.com/extropic_vc))  
> **Metrics:** 7 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 342 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T01:11:17+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/extropic_vc/status/2113075686273646729](https://x.com/extropic_vc/status/2113075686273646729)  


> **Visual Note:** A long-term cryptocurrency chart labeled “Exotic created with TradingView.com, Oct 21, 2026 21:47 UTC,” “ICPUSDT,” and “USDT · Balance” shows prices falling from 2022 into 2027, with a large red arrow pointing sharply lower.  

> 
> "Dear 
$ICP
 holder,

Dump your dead ICP bags and buy 
$NEAR
.

You've been warned."


### Post #27 by @DaoKingdom
> **Author:** Dao King ([@DaoKingdom](https://x.com/DaoKingdom))  
> **Metrics:** 8 likes · 1 retweets · 0 comments · 309 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T21:42:37+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/DaoKingdom/status/2113385561771942233](https://x.com/DaoKingdom/status/2113385561771942233)  


> 
> "Always 
$ICP
 drama...LOL..."


### Post #28 by @the_cia_hacker
> **Author:** Justin Liverman ([@the_cia_hacker](https://x.com/the_cia_hacker))  
> **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 294 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T04:29:20+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/the_cia_hacker/status/2113125526353449206](https://x.com/the_cia_hacker/status/2113125526353449206)  


> 
> "bro you know something is cooked when Dom from ICP is shitting on it"


### Post #29 by @jp_dawg
> **Author:** JP.near (⋈) ([@jp_dawg](https://x.com/jp_dawg))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 244 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T15:50:56+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/jp_dawg/status/2113297058128105500](https://x.com/jp_dawg/status/2113297058128105500)  


> 
> "Hey fans of Internet CP (
$ICP
). You can have your stupid patent back if you stop using Transformers to run your cheap AI slop"


### Post #30 by @cizi31
> **Author:** Çizi ([@cizi31](https://x.com/cizi31))  
> **Metrics:** 10 likes · 2 retweets · 3 comments · 238 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T18:47:54+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/cizi31/status/2113341593079992440](https://x.com/cizi31/status/2113341593079992440)  


> 
> "Dominic, this is not how serious projects should behave.

You admit NEAR has made progress, yet still accuse it of stealing ICP technology without clear proof.

If NEAR copied your work, show the evidence. If not, stop spreading FUD.

Focus on building your own project instead"


### Post #31 by @Kamsiobimdike10
> **Author:** KamsiObimdike ([@Kamsiobimdike10](https://x.com/Kamsiobimdike10))  
> **Metrics:** 15 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 212 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T01:14:57+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Kamsiobimdike10/status/2113076610219819145](https://x.com/Kamsiobimdike10/status/2113076610219819145)  


> **Visual Note:** Dark-themed bar chart titled “Injective — Smart Contract Platform Revenue” compares revenue from Jan 2024 to Oct 2026. Injective leads at roughly $22M, followed by NEAR Protocol (~$18M), Internet Computer (~$17.5M), Sui (~$17M), Starknet (~$12M), Aptos (~$4M), Monad (~$2M), and Stellar (~$1.5M).  

> 
> "Injective's onchain revenue is climbing faster than most people are talking about.

Look at the chart Injective shared, covering smart contract platform revenue from Jan 2024 to Oct 2026. 

Injective sits at the top, ahead of 
@NEARProtocol
, 
@dfinity
, 
@SuiNetwork
, 
@monad
 and"


### Post #32 by @DEREK_88888888
> **Author:** DEREK ([@DEREK_88888888](https://x.com/DEREK_88888888))  
> **Metrics:** 10 likes · 1 retweets · 1 comments · 207 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T12:00:02+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/DEREK_88888888/status/2113238949552607426](https://x.com/DEREK_88888888/status/2113238949552607426)  


> **Video Content:** [video-unavailable: could not fetch or sample]  

> 
> "Shielded 
$ICP
 has officially launched. 

By moving beyond hardware-level limits (like SEV) to pure cryptography, client-side zero-knowledge proofs make every transaction private.
$ZEC
 style #privacy on #InternetComputer!

#ICP #ZEC #BTC #CRPTO"


### Post #33 by @LeaderAlphaNews
> **Author:** Leader Alpha ([@LeaderAlphaNews](https://x.com/LeaderAlphaNews))  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 205 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T18:33:19+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/LeaderAlphaNews/status/2113337925199077865](https://x.com/LeaderAlphaNews/status/2113337925199077865)  


> **Video Content:** A colorful illustrated debate graphic asks “CRITICISM OR CRYPTO TRIBALISM?” and “JUDGE THE CLAIM OR THE CRITIC?”, showing ICP fans on the left, NEAR fans on the right, a referee robot, evidence papers, and a “LEADER ALPHA” whale graphic.  

> 
> "CRITICISM OR CRYPTO TRIBALISM? ICP / NEAR HAS ENTERED THE CHAT.
@TheDesertLynx
 calls toxic founder and community attacks a red flag, reacting to Dominic Williams' criticism of NEAR Confidential Intents.
@DBCrypt0
 directly pushes back: a valid technical argument should stand on"


### Post #34 by @shawmakesmagic
> **Author:** Shaw ([@shawmakesmagic](https://x.com/shawmakesmagic))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 1 retweets · 0 comments · 202 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T00:41:35+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/shawmakesmagic/status/2113068213282263063](https://x.com/shawmakesmagic/status/2113068213282263063)  


> 
> "I agree it’s not great to come out aggressively attacking other builders

But I do want to point out that TEE is not the right technology for a distributed permissionless network due to side channel attacks. Both NEAR and ICP run on whitelisted nodes, though, and until recently"


### Post #35 by @jp_dawg
> **Author:** JP.near (⋈) ([@jp_dawg](https://x.com/jp_dawg))  
> **Metrics:** 9 likes · 0 retweets · 3 comments · 201 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T15:46:39+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/jp_dawg/status/2113295980590481583](https://x.com/jp_dawg/status/2113295980590481583)  


> **Visual Note:** A cryptocurrency trading webpage for “Internet Computer / ICP” shows a red candlestick price chart and a trade panel with “Long,” “Short,” “Market,” “Open short,” and an account balance around “$1,474.80.”  

> 
> "Shots fired 
$ICP
, its on"


### Post #36 by @ICPLEGEND1966
> **Author:** Welsh ICP Conviction.ICP ([@ICPLEGEND1966](https://x.com/ICPLEGEND1966))  
> **Metrics:** 9 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 196 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T17:42:18+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ICPLEGEND1966/status/2113325083909308927](https://x.com/ICPLEGEND1966/status/2113325083909308927)  


> 
> "$ICP
  THE NEXT INTERNET IS BEING BUILT — AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE KEEPS EXPANDING!

The latest reported Internet Computer dashboard figures demonstrate the scale of 
$ICP
's decentralised computing ecosystem.

 MAINNET

 42 subnets across 33 countries
 618 node"


### Post #37 by @trader1sz
> **Author:** TraderSZ ([@trader1sz](https://x.com/trader1sz))  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 185 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T14:14:43+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/trader1sz/status/2113272844683477366](https://x.com/trader1sz/status/2113272844683477366)  


> **Visual Note:** A Binance candlestick chart labeled “ICP / TetherUS · 4h · Binance” shows ICPUSDT around 2,778, down 3.88%, with a marked horizontal level near 3,221 and trading-tool icons along the bottom.  

> 
> "Let’s all short icp"


### Post #38 by @vinibarbosabr
> **Author:** Vini B 「thecoding.dev」 ([@vinibarbosabr](https://x.com/vinibarbosabr))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 158 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T17:00:58+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/vinibarbosabr/status/2113314680768692580](https://x.com/vinibarbosabr/status/2113314680768692580)  


> **Visual Note:** Two side-by-side social media pages: on the left, a JustHoot profile for “INDERNED KEPUTER” shows market-cap stats including “$81.19K,” “$0.8119,” “24h volume $361K,” and Buy/Sell buttons; on the right, a cartoon meme labeled “INTERNED KEPUTER” appears on an X post.  

> 
> "great feature!

the problem, imo, with shorting ICP is that it has a so small liquidity that it makes it fairly easy for someone (like dom, for example) to briefly pump the token for short squeeze, before dumping it all.

the more open shorts, he bigger the incentives.

$IKP"


### Post #39 by @ICPRenegades
> **Author:** ICP Renegades ([@ICPRenegades](https://x.com/ICPRenegades))  
> **Metrics:** 9 likes · 2 retweets · 0 comments · 157 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T12:04:39+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ICPRenegades/status/2113240110670229779](https://x.com/ICPRenegades/status/2113240110670229779)  


> **Video Content:** [video-unavailable: could not fetch or sample]  

> 
> "What a graduation ceremony for HOMELESS

Getting down in celebration

Live now on 
@ICPSwap
 #ICP #ICPRenegades"


### Post #40 by @gandreou007
> **Author:** Giannis Andreou ([@gandreou007](https://x.com/gandreou007))  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 150 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T14:30:01+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/gandreou007/status/2113276694274494614](https://x.com/gandreou007/status/2113276694274494614)  


> **Visual Note:** A weekly ICP/USDT price chart shows a long decline, range trading, and a projected recovery toward $20, with annotations including “2024 HIGH = $21,” “2026 BASE,” and “RECOVERY OBJECTIVE.”  

> 
> "$ICP
: THE $20 REBOOT STARTS WITH A $3.60 TEST 

ICP is forming a tentative weekly base, with $2.6–$2.8 as immediate support.

A sustained reclaim of $3.3–$3.6 would bring $4–$4.5, then $5–$6.5 into focus.

Above that, $7.5–$9.5, $10–$12 and $14–$16 stand before the 2024"


### Post #41 by @chikoevm
> **Author:** Chiko Chiko ([@chikoevm](https://x.com/chikoevm))  
> **Metrics:** 9 likes · 0 retweets · 9 comments · 150 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T03:50:00+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/chikoevm/status/2113115628202611166](https://x.com/chikoevm/status/2113115628202611166)  


> **Visual Note:** Twitter/X posts from 'dom | icp' (@dominic_w) discussing PhD engineers and NEAR 'Confidential Intents' with a quote about privacy claims, followed by a reply from 'Andy' (@andyys) referencing Lmfao ICP founder's opinion on blockchain tech.  

> 
> "Fud Shock
Founder ICP sau khi gây tiếng vang chia gần 300 lần. Dùng đủ mọi chiêu trò để gây chú ý lần nữa ko thành.
Đã trực tiếp lên tiếng chê bai Near nhưng mượn lời 1 PhD để chỉ trích.

Founder The Rollup cảm thấy DOM còn cùng quẫn hơn cả Carrick ở MU"


### Post #42 by @BitWalker_
> **Author:** ₿itWalker ([@BitWalker_](https://x.com/BitWalker_))  
> **Metrics:** 12 likes · 1 retweets · 0 comments · 134 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T16:47:09+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/BitWalker_/status/2113311206253453422](https://x.com/BitWalker_/status/2113311206253453422)  


> **Visual Note:** Two men appear on a conference stage: one wears a Roman-style costume and laurel crown while pointing toward a man holding a microphone and a yellow shirt reading “Borshch.” Visible branding includes “NEARCON” and “NEAR Protocol.”  

> 
> "Justin Bons had another episode on X and started talking nonsense about ICP again.

At this point, it was only a matter of time before 
@empierrepump
 stepped in.

When the blockchain industry loses its balance, Empierre restores order the old-fashioned way — no long debates, no"


### Post #43 by @PartyhatsICP
> **Author:** Partyhats ∞ ([@PartyhatsICP](https://x.com/PartyhatsICP))  
> **Metrics:** 7 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 103 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T10:03:44+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/PartyhatsICP/status/2113209682882109794](https://x.com/PartyhatsICP/status/2113209682882109794)  


> **Video Content:** [video-unavailable: could not fetch or sample]  

> 
> "$NEAR
 holders coming to attack 
$ICP"


### Post #44 by @mosesibb
> **Author:** Moses ∞ ([@mosesibb](https://x.com/mosesibb))  
> **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 80 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T14:48:40+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113281390326210892](https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113281390326210892)  


> **Visual Note:** An ICP “Internet Computer” architecture diagram labels “End user,” “Developer,” “UX,” “DEPLOY,” “ICP protocol,” “IP / Internet,” “Data Centers,” and “Public cyberspace.”  

> 
> "@NEARProtocol
 stole a technology that was patented by 
@dfinity
.

There will be consequences! 
$ICP"


### Post #45 by @ruecatsolana
> **Author:** Rue Cat Solana | RUECAT ([@ruecatsolana](https://x.com/ruecatsolana))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 1 retweets · 0 comments · 79 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T19:33:29+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ruecatsolana/status/2113353066317582802](https://x.com/ruecatsolana/status/2113353066317582802)  


> 
> "Top 10 Blockchains 2026 — $RUECAT Overall Score 

1. Solana 
$SOL
 — 78.0/100
2. BNB Smart Chain (BSC) 
$BNB
 — 72.4/100
3. Ethereum 
$ETH
 — 73.4/100
4. Sui 
$SUI
 — 71.7/100
5. Internet Computer 
$ICP
 — 70.8/100
6. Aptos 
$APT
 — 70.7/100
7. Polygon 
$POL
 — 69.9/100
8. NEAR Protocol"


### Post #46 by @mosesibb
> **Author:** Moses ∞ ([@mosesibb](https://x.com/mosesibb))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 1 retweets · 0 comments · 72 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T11:03:21+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113224686813188451](https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113224686813188451)  


> 
> "Yeah I have memecoins too and it price is already speaking for itself over #Near, one memecoin in CMC have more marketcap than both #Near and #ICP join together"


### Post #47 by @MINopoly_
> **Author:** MINopoly ([@MINopoly_](https://x.com/MINopoly_))  
> **Metrics:** 2 likes · 1 retweets · 1 comments · 71 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T13:49:57+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/MINopoly_/status/2113266613017260464](https://x.com/MINopoly_/status/2113266613017260464)  


> **Visual Note:** A dark infographic titled “6k+ ‘TPS’ claimed, 0.38 real transfers a second” compares TPS claims and chain-settlement figures, including “0.38,” “0.63,” “10.9,” “16,245x,” “3,629x,” “63,469,” and “USD 6,986.”  

> 
> "$icp
 fraud"


### Post #48 by @MINopoly_
> **Author:** MINopoly ([@MINopoly_](https://x.com/MINopoly_))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 1 retweets · 0 comments · 70 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T16:28:22+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/MINopoly_/status/2113306477196972258](https://x.com/MINopoly_/status/2113306477196972258)  


> **Visual Note:** A dark bar chart titled “NEAR vs ICP — 2026 protocol revenue” compares gross protocol revenue through Oct. 22, 2026, showing NEAR at $40.2M versus ICP at $1.6M; the caption says NEAR generated roughly 25× more and cites DefiLlama.  

> 
> "I can see why 
$icp
 holders are trying to fud 
$near
. Case closed suckers."


### Post #49 by @PANONYGroup
> **Author:** PANONY ([@PANONYGroup](https://x.com/PANONYGroup))  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 1 retweets · 1 comments · 69 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T10:00:45+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/PANONYGroup/status/2113208930126156193](https://x.com/PANONYGroup/status/2113208930126156193)  


> **Visual Note:** A verified post by “dom | ICP” (@dominic_w) says it asked a PhD engineer about NEAR “Confidential Intents,” calling the privacy and confidentiality setup “so bad” and “comical.”  

> 
> "PANews Feature | DFINITY Founder Challenges NEAR’s Privacy Design; The Community Pushes Back
@dfinity
 founder 
@dominic_w
 questioned whether 
@NEARProtocol
's Confidential Intents relies too heavily on trust in permissioned node operators. NEAR’s response: those design choices were"


### Post #50 by @vinibarbosabr
> **Author:** Vini B 「thecoding.dev」 ([@vinibarbosabr](https://x.com/vinibarbosabr))  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 2 retweets · 0 comments · 62 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T04:45:43+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/vinibarbosabr/status/2113129651002372332](https://x.com/vinibarbosabr/status/2113129651002372332)  


> **Visual Note:** A split-screen meme shows a JustHoot trading page for "INDERNED KEPUTER" on the left and an X post featuring a cartoon seller labeled "INDERNED KEPUTER" on the right.  

> 
> "salty founder is bearish, so i tried to short ICP
but liquidity is too thin, so it didn't make sense

which is why i bought IKP on 
@justhootfun
to at least have some fun and ratio dom in revenue with a memecoin

this is hilarious, ngl
the inderned keputer, lol

on 
@dominic_w
's"


### Post #51 by @vinibarbosabr
> **Author:** Vini B 「thecoding.dev」 ([@vinibarbosabr](https://x.com/vinibarbosabr))  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 1 comments · 55 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T15:52:36+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/vinibarbosabr/status/2113297475733794846](https://x.com/vinibarbosabr/status/2113297475733794846)  


> 
> "DOM (ICP) CLAIMS IP THEFT: DFINITY VS NEAR INTENTS
@dominic_w
 from dfinity/icp just published a long piece claiming near intents is running on stolen proprietary dfinity tech, that a fired former employee helped them do it, and more

 let's fact-check and understand it ↓"


### Post #52 by @mosesibb
> **Author:** Moses ∞ ([@mosesibb](https://x.com/mosesibb))  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 46 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T14:18:40+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113273837794017622](https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113273837794017622)  


> **Visual Note:** An exploded network-layer diagram shows stacked “Data Centers,” “IP,” “ICP,” and “INTERNET COMPUTER” layers with app icons such as Google, Amazon, JS, and KALOS.  

> 
> "I said it then when 
@dfinity
 was sacking some employees and some 
$ICP
 community members started attacking 
@dfinity
, that some of those employees were there to destroy Dfinity and that majority of them were being sponsored by 
$ICP
 competitors.

Now the truth is coming out! 

So"


### Post #53 by @mosesibb
> **Author:** Moses ∞ ([@mosesibb](https://x.com/mosesibb))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 40 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T15:47:04+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113296083631681731](https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113296083631681731)  


> 
> "@dfinity
 $ICP
 seems to be the only one building real and genuine technology in this space. The job of others is to wait and steal from them, at least the ones they can steal! 
$ICP"


### Post #54 by @mosesibb
> **Author:** Moses ∞ ([@mosesibb](https://x.com/mosesibb))  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 37 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T13:52:53+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113267348010365288](https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113267348010365288)  


> **Visual Note:** A promotional image shows a bearded man using an inhaler-like tube beside a bag labeled “AN 1917 NO,” “NEAR POWDER,” “Banderas finest white powder,” and a stylized “M” logo, with white powder scattered on a reflective table.  

> 
> "Lol  
@NEARProtocol
 stole tech they can't handle, maintain, or upgrade from 
@dfinity
, and now they're planning to downgrade from it. 

This is what happens when you steal a car without knowing how to drive it. 
$ICP"


### Post #55 by @mosesibb
> **Author:** Moses ∞ ([@mosesibb](https://x.com/mosesibb))  
> **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 32 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T15:32:54+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113292519832481877](https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113292519832481877)  


> **Video Content:** [video-unavailable: could not fetch or sample]  

> 
> "WE are in 
$ICP
 and we don't care because we are safe!"


### Post #56 by @mosesibb
> **Author:** Moses ∞ ([@mosesibb](https://x.com/mosesibb))  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 30 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T16:26:45+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113306069921391052](https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113306069921391052)  


> **Visual Note:** A Chainspect comparison graphic contrasts NEAR and ICP across stake, 30-day TPS, market cap, Nakamoto coefficient, developers, fees, GitHub stars, and on-chain revenue.  

> 
> "$ICP
 makes more onchain revenue than #Near, the criminal organization Near guys are will skip that part"


### Post #57 by @mosesibb
> **Author:** Moses ∞ ([@mosesibb](https://x.com/mosesibb))  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 27 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T13:05:35+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113255448233103715](https://x.com/mosesibb/status/2113255448233103715)  


> 
> "@dominic_w
 is out here looking for trouble with all these garbage meme technology chains, and honestly, I love it! 

Because only the Truth will set this crypto industry free! 
$ICP
  x.com/dominic_w/stat
…"


### Post #58 by @mrBORO
> **Author:** mrBORO ([@mrBORO](https://x.com/mrBORO))  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 27 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T14:39:18+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/mrBORO/status/2113279029469937768](https://x.com/mrBORO/status/2113279029469937768)  


> 
> "new dram in the ct:
$ICP
 vs 
$NEAR"


### Post #59 by @yuva213
> **Author:** yuvaraj.sol ([@yuva213](https://x.com/yuva213))  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 2 views  

> **Posted:** 2026-10-22T18:11:14+00:00  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/yuva213/status/2113332364093092185](https://x.com/yuva213/status/2113332364093092185)  


> 
> "flexing 42 subnets across 33 countries for the Internet Computer is peak infrastructure maxing"




---

*Generated by Context Pilot Social Intelligence Engine.*