# $CONSO Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-10-22 20:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $CONSO  
> **Momentum Status:** Low signal  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-10-22 20:50 UTC (2026-10-22T20:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-22-20-50/crypto/CONSO  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-22-20-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 136
- **Likes:** 9
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 4

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 4, Retweets: 0, Likes: 9, Impressions: 136


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @aspenshredder
> **Author:** [@aspenshredder](https://x.com/aspenshredder)  
> **Metrics:** 5 likes · 0 retweets · 3 comments · 136 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/aspenshredder/status/2113369718900064470](https://x.com/aspenshredder/status/2113369718900064470)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot shows the “Bitwise Blue-Chip NFT Collections Index,” marked “Rebalanced: Yes” and “Changes: No changes.” It lists CryptoPunks at 63.75%, Bored Ape Yacht Club at 12.33%, Pudgy Penguins at 5.65%, Chromie Squiggle at 4.87%, Fidenza at 3.92%, Mutant Ape Yacht Club at 3.16%, VeeFriends at 2.32%, Milady Maker at 1.85%, Lil Pudgys at 1.33%, and Moonbirds at 0.83%, illustrating an institutional NFT allocation heavily concentrated in CryptoPunks.  

> 
> "This is how institutions balance their NFT portfolio. What would you do differently?"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@0xCrocy` (https://x.com/0xCrocy)