# $STATICFLOW Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-10-11 03:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $STATICFLOW  
> **Momentum Status:** Low signal  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-10-11 03:40 UTC (2026-10-11T03:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-11-03-40/crypto/STATICFLOW  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-11-03-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 30
- **Likes:** 1
- **Retweets:** 1
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 1, Likes: 1, Impressions: 30


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @_0xBenjamin
> **Author:** [@_0xBenjamin](https://x.com/_0xBenjamin)  
> **Metrics:** 3 likes · 0 retweets · 4 comments · 129 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/_0xBenjamin/status/2109124330546491780](https://x.com/_0xBenjamin/status/2109124330546491780)  


> **Visual Context:** An infographic illustrates a smart contract exploit, showing a '79% LP BURNED' secured vault with a 'CONTRACT PRIVILEGES (BACKDOOR)' funnel draining $14.35M from a '79AU/USDT POOL'.  

> 
> "$79AU POOL DRAINED FOR $14.35M DESPITE 79% OF LP RECEIPTS BEING BURNED!

A PancakeSwap pool for $79AU, the token of 79thVault, lost $14.35M in USDT on October 7.

Here’s the scary part: burning LP receipts didn’t protect the liquidity.

 A privileged permission in the token"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@GTSewell` (https://x.com/GTSewell)