# $MNTD Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-10-10 21:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $MNTD  
> **Momentum Status:** Low signal  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-10-10 21:30 UTC (2026-10-10T21:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-10-21-30/crypto/MNTD  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-10-21-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 64
- **Likes:** 10
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 7

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 7, Retweets: 0, Likes: 10, Impressions: 64


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @LunarCrush
> **Author:** [@LunarCrush](https://x.com/LunarCrush)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 1.6K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/LunarCrush/status/2109033985884164499](https://x.com/LunarCrush/status/2109033985884164499)  


> **Visual Context:** A marketing intelligence brief showing a scatter plot of followers vs. engagements on Nordstrom, highlighting that an outfit/forms YouTube channel with 24.9K followers drove 3.92M engagements—65% of the brand's total—with a takeaway advising brands to rank creator shortlists by engagement rather than audience size. The visualization supports the post's point that a small channel outperformed massive TikTok accounts (Nordstrom, Sneaker News, Creator, Musician) in driving real engagement.  

> 
> "a 24,900-follower channel drove 65% of nordstrom's engagement this week. audience size is a terrible shortlist filter"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@denispodd_17` (https://x.com/denispodd_17)