# $DEMOS Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-10-05 15:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $DEMOS  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-10-05 15:50 UTC (2026-10-05T15:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-05-15-50/crypto/DEMOS  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-05-15-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 233
- **Likes:** 8
- **Retweets:** 3
- **Comments:** 2

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 2, Retweets: 3, Likes: 8, Impressions: 233


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @reddit
> **Author:** [@reddit](https://x.com/reddit)  
> **Metrics:** 1 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 100 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/reddit/status/e1490ef61244ca9a6a94c652e4289e293c1f3938dda0dcbff069fc8f43e0ced6](https://x.com/reddit/status/e1490ef61244ca9a6a94c652e4289e293c1f3938dda0dcbff069fc8f43e0ced6)  


> 
> "Bitget Hack Investigation: How the Stolen Funds Moved Across Eight Blockchains

We recently followed stolen funds into Bitcoin and ended up with two very different forensic situations. One branch consolidated into 10 unspent Bitcoin UTXOs containing about 87.82 BTC attributable to the traced flow. At that point the monitoring problem was relatively straightforward: the outputs were still unspent, so they remained concrete observation points. Another branch entered Wasabi CoinJoin. That seems like a much more important analytical boundary than the fact that the funds originally came from another chain. Before CoinJoin, you're following identifiable Bitcoin outputs."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@demos_network` (https://x.com/demos_network)