# $OKX Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-10-04 11:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $OKX  
> **Momentum Status:** Low signal  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-10-04 11:50 UTC (2026-10-04T11:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-04-11-50/crypto/OKX  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-04-11-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 4
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 4


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @m786w2
> **Author:** [@m786w2](https://x.com/m786w2)  
> **Metrics:** 56 likes · 4 retweets · 28 comments · 5.0K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/m786w2/status/2106663233247428920](https://x.com/m786w2/status/2106663233247428920)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows an NFT collection statistics page for "Original Blokyz" by OriginalBlokyz_Treasury on Ethereum, displaying a floor price of $159.32 (down 9.2% in 24H), 24H volume of $4,073.11, total volume of $4.61M, and 1,372 listed items (13.7% of 9,996 supply). This relates to the post's debate comparing Blokyz to wifoutlaw, with the image providing current market metrics for Blokyz as the user questions why it receives less attention.  

> 
> "Everyone talking about 
@crypto_czar_eth
 wifoutlaw 
Why nobody talking about 
@OriginalBlokyz
 just a simple question  

In my point of view wif cooked better then blokyz isn't 

Prove me wrong here"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@cheuk_baby` (https://x.com/cheuk_baby)