# $DUBJEONGTRADES Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-10-03 13:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $DUBJEONGTRADES  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-10-03 13:10 UTC (2026-10-03T13:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-03-13-10/crypto/DUBJEONGTRADES  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-10-03-13-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 296
- **Likes:** 17
- **Retweets:** 2
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 2, Likes: 17, Impressions: 296


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Mariya1762933
> **Author:** [@Mariya1762933](https://x.com/Mariya1762933)  
> **Metrics:** 12 likes · 0 retweets · 6 comments · 429 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Mariya1762933/status/2106361822999990407](https://x.com/Mariya1762933/status/2106361822999990407)  


> **Visual Context:** A Discord screenshot showing a chat message discussing a mint with a high mint price (MP) of around $50, with the post noting that many people skipped minting despite having whitelist (WL) access due to the high price. The interface shows typical Discord elements like user avatars and a "Mint-09501" channel name.  

> 
> "After a long time we seeing a mint with high MP performing so well. 

MP ~ 50$ 

I heard many didn’t minted despite having the WL for it because of high MP and it’s totally understandable why. 

Because many highly paid mints failed for last couple of weeks.

But if you minted"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@dubjeongtrades` (https://x.com/dubjeongtrades)